RHODES v. HALLAM et al
Plaintiff: Gina Rhodes
Defendant: Bernice Hallam and Glenn Hallam
Case Number: 3:2019cv03210
Filed: August 21, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY
Referring Judge: ROGER VINSON
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 FINAL SCHEDULING ORDER Re: #7 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting :All discovery must be completed by 2/28/2020. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON on 10/2/2019. (alb)
October 1, 2019 Filing 7 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (POWELL, ROBERT)
October 1, 2019 ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON notified that action is needed Re: #7 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (alb)
September 11, 2019 Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by BERNICE HALLAM, GLENN HALLAM. (HATLER, RYAN)
August 28, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by ROBERT JAMES POWELL on behalf of GINA RHODES (POWELL, ROBERT)
August 28, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by MEGAN FORTSON FRY on behalf of GINA RHODES (FRY, MEGAN)
August 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER : Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set for 9/5/2019. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 10/7/2019. Discovery due by 1/21/2020. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON on 8/22/2019. (alb)
August 22, 2019 Filing 2 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: The parties in the above-referenced case were added to the docket incorrectly and will be corrected by the clerk. Party names are to be entered in all caps and without punctuation. For future reference: Please review the procedure for adding/creating new parties in the "Style Guide for Electronic Case Filing" and/or chapter 10 of the "CM/ECF Attorney User's Guide," available at www.flnd.uscourts.gov. (alb)
August 22, 2019 ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON notified that action is needed Re: #1 Notice of Removal. (see proposed ISO.) (alb)
August 21, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Glenn Hallam, Bernice Hallam from Walton County Circuit Court, case number 19CA349. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AFLNDC-4596712.), filed by Glenn Hallam, Bernice Hallam. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (HATLER, RYAN)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: RHODES v. HALLAM et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bernice Hallam
Represented By: RYAN PAUL HATLER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Glenn Hallam
Represented By: RYAN PAUL HATLER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gina Rhodes
Represented By: MEGAN FORTSON FRY
Represented By: MARK DOUGLASS DAVIS
Represented By: ROBERT JAMES POWELL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?