SANCHEZ v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff: INGRID S SANCHEZ
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Case Number: 3:2019cv04653
Filed: November 12, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: LACEY A COLLIER
Referring Judge: MICHAEL J FRANK
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER denying without prejudice #3 Motion TO APPOINT COUNSEL. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 12/5/2019. (jcw)
December 5, 2019 Filing 8 Summons Issued as to COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (jcw)
December 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER re #1 Complaint. Pursuant to Rule 4(i), the clerk of the court shall issue THREE (3) summonses for Defendant and send the summonses to Plaintiff. Plaintiff is responsible for prompt service of the summonses and copies of the amended complaint upon Defendant. ( Notify Chambers on 3/4/2020 re 90 days for service.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 12/5/2019. (jcw)
December 4, 2019 Filing 6 Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number FLN300013442. Fee status updated to paid. (alb)
December 4, 2019 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: 6 Filing Fee Received. (alb)
November 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER denying without prejudice #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The clerk of the court is directed to send Plaintiff a copy of the forms for non-prisoner parties to request leave to proceed in forma pauperis. This case number should be written on the form. On or before 12/13/2019, Plaintiff shall either: (a) pay the $400.00 filing fee; or (b) submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis with a properly completed affidavit of financial status. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 11/13/2019. (jcw)(Form sent as ordered.)
November 13, 2019 Filing 4 Notice to Pro Se (jcw)
November 13, 2019 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #3 MOTION REQUESTING APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL, #1 Complaint, #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to MICHAEL J FRANK. (jcw)
November 12, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION REQUESTING APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL by INGRID S SANCHEZ. (jcw)
November 12, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by INGRID S SANCHEZ. (jcw)
November 12, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, filed by INGRID S SANCHEZ. (Filing fee was not paid. No service copies filed.) (jcw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SANCHEZ v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: INGRID S SANCHEZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?