COWELL v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
JOSHUA R COWELL |
OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD and BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY |
3:2019cv04887 |
December 2, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
GARY R JONES |
M CASEY RODGERS |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #5 Notice of Certification (djb) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Certification by JOSHUA R COWELL. (djb) |
Filing 4 Notice to Pro Se Litigant mailed with 3:16md2734 orders, 1131, 1135, 1136 and 1137 and 1138. (Deficient documents also returned per MCR chambers). (djb) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, #2 Affidavit, #1 Complaint (djb) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by JOSHUA R COWELL. (djb) |
Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT of Inability to Secure Costs by JOSHUA R COWELL. (djb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD, filed by JOSHUA R COWELL. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (djb) Modified on 12/5/2019 (djb). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.