OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. J E DUNN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
| OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY |
| J E DUNN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY |
| 3:2019cv04973 |
| December 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #8 Response in Opposition re #5 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and to Stay the Case, and Memorandum in Support filed by OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY. (mb) |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and to Stay the Case, and Memorandum in Support filed by OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY. (DIVERS, BRETT) |
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #5 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and to Stay the Case, and Memorandum in Support ( (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 2/7/2020).). Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 1/23/2020. (TVJ)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #5 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and to Stay the Case, and Memorandum in Support (Unopposed) by OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY. (DIEHL, NATHAN) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #5 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and to Stay the Case, and Memorandum in Support. (sdw) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and to Stay the Case, and Memorandum in Support by J E DUNN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L) (QUINTERO, JASON) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to J E DUNN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. (MB) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Change of Address by BRETT D DIVERS (DIVERS, BRETT) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE Summons in a Civil Action by OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY re #1 Complaint, (DIVERS, BRETT) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against J.E. Dunn Construction Company ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AFLNDC-4748620.), filed by OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D) (DIVERS, BRETT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. J E DUNN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: J E DUNN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY | |
| Represented By: | JASON JUDE QUINTERO |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY | |
| Represented By: | BRETT D DIVERS |
| Represented By: | NATHAN F DIEHL |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
