WILSON v. JOSEPH
| CLEVELAND WILSON |
| M.V. JOSEPH and M V JOSEPH |
| 3:2021cv00018 |
| January 4, 2021 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MICHAEL J FRANK |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #3 Order - Filing fee/IFP was not received. (jcw) |
Filing 3
ORDER. The clerk of the court shall send to Petitioner a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis for use by prisoners. On or before February 11, 2021, Petitioner shall: a. pay $5.00; or b. submit a fully-completed motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis with the necessary attachments. (Filing Fee or IFP Motion due by 2/11/2021.) (IFP Form mailed w/ORDER). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 1/12/2021. (mb)
|
| Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se (jcw) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (jcw) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by CLEVELAND WILSON. (Filing fee was not paid. No service copies filed.) (jcw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
