IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPLAINT OF RANGER JAZZ GROUP, LLC AND MIKE KIRK
| IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPLAINT OF RANGER JAZZ GROUP, LLC AND MIKE KIRK |
| UNKNOWN |
| MARINA MANAGEMENT CORP. |
| IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPLAINT OF RANGER JAZZ GROUP LLC AND MIKE KIRK |
| 3:2021cv00352 |
| February 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| HOPE T CANNON |
| MICHAEL J FRANK |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| T KENT WETHERELL |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO CLAIM OF MARINA MANAGEMENT CORP re #7 Answer to Complaint Counterclaim, of Marina Management Corp. by IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPLAINT OF RANGER JAZZ GROUP LLC AND MIKE KIRK. (SHINKLE, THEODORE) Modified on 4/26/2021 to correct title of pdf document to match docket text (mb). |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, , COUNTERCLAIM against IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPLAINT OF RANGER JAZZ GROUP AND MIKE KIRK by MARINA MANAGEMENT CORP.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Contract) (FLEMING, EDWARD) Modified on 4/20/2021 (djb). |
Filing 6
ORDER REASSIGNING AND CONSOLIDATING ADDITIONAL CASES. Cases No. 3:21cv353-MCR-HTC, 3:21cv363-MCR-HTC, and 3:21cv352-MCR-HTC are consolidated as part of Case No. 3:20cv5943-TKW-MJF. The Clerk shall reassign the newly consolidated cases to the undersigned as district judge and Judge Michael J. Frank as magistrate judge in conformance with the other cases. The newly consolidated cases are subject to the deadlines established in the scheduling order in the lead (or low) case (Doc. 27). Case reassigned to JUDGE T KENT WETHERELL II and MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK for all further proceedings. JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS, MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON no longer assigned to case, Cases associated. Set/Clear Flags. Signed by JUDGE T KENT WETHERELL II on 4/5/2021. (blr)
|
|
Filing 5
MONITION re #4 ORDER APPROVING AD INTERIM STIPULATION, DIRECTING ISSUANCE OF MONITION AND INJUNCTION. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 4/1/2021. (jcw)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER APPROVING AD INTERIM STIPULATION, DIRECTING ISSUANCE OF MONITION AND INJUNCTION re #3 MOTION to Approve Ad Interim Stipulation and to Enter Monition and Injunction. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 4/1/2021. (jcw)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #3 MOTION to Approve Ad Interim Stipulation and to Enter Monition and Injunction (mb) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Approve Ad Interim Stipulation and to Enter Monition and Injunction by IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPLAINT OF RANGER JAZZ GROUP, LLC AND MIKE KIRK. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit) (SHINKLE, THEODORE) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint, #2 Stipulation (Ad Interim) of Value and Stipulation for Costs by IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPLAINT OF RANGER JAZZ GROUP, LLC AND MIKE KIRK. (mb) |
| Filing 2 STIPULATION (Ad Interim) of Value and Stipulation for Costs by IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPLAINT OF RANGER JAZZ GROUP, LLC AND MIKE KIRK. (SHINKLE, THEODORE) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLNDC-5965215.), filed by IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPLAINT OF RANGER JAZZ GROUP, LLC AND MIKE KIRK. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (SHINKLE, THEODORE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
