BRADLEY v. THE SCHOOL BOARD OF OKALOOSA COUNTY FLORIDA
| CHRISTOPHER J BRADLEY |
| ASHLEY MOODY, MARCUS CHAMBERS, ERIC ADEN, REBECCA HORST, AFS-USA INC, ADAM NIXON, DOES 1 - 30, ANN HORST, MARK STANLEY, TODD HORST, DANIEL WOOTEN, JOHN LEDBETTER, RON DESANTIS, MARY POLSON, THE SCHOOL BOARD OFFICE OF OKALOOSA COUNTY FLORIDA, CHARLIE MARELLO and DEBORAH MURPHY |
| 3:2021cv00408 |
| March 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| HOPE T CANNON |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - RECOMMENDED: This case be DISMISSED as frivolous. The clerk be directed to close the file. R&R flag set. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 4/28/2021. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 5/26/2021. (mb)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - ORDERED: Plaintiff's amended motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Doc. #6 ) is DENIED. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 4/28/2021. (mb)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #4 Order. (Filing fee not received). (mb) |
| Filing 6 AMENDED MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by CHRISTOPHER J BRADLEY. (Attachments: #1 Supplement) (alb) |
| Filing 5 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against ERIC ADEN, AFS-USA INC, MARCUS CHAMBERS, RON DESANTIS, DOES 1 - 30, ANN HORST, REBECCA HORST, TODD HORST, JOHN LEDBETTER, CHARLIE MARELLO, ASHLEY MOODY, DEBORAH MURPHY, ADAM NIXON, MARY POLSON, MARK STANLEY, THE SCHOOL BOARD OFFICE OF OKALOOSA COUNTY FLORIDA, DANIEL WOOTEN, filed by CHRISTOPHER J BRADLEY. (No service copies.) (alb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #5 Amended Complaint. Referred to HOPE T CANNON. (alb) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF Doc. #2 ) is DENIED. Within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this order, if Plaintiff intends to proceed with this action, he shall submit the $402.00 filing fee to the clerk. The clerk shall send Plaintiff one (1) section 1983 complaint form for use by pro se, non-prisoner litigants. Within the same time period, Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint. (Amended Complaint and Filing Fee due by 4/6/2021.) (Form mailed w/ORDER). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 3/16/2021. (mb)
|
| Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se Litigant, CHRISTOPHER J BRADLEY. (mb) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by CHRISTOPHER J BRADLEY. (mb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ERIC ADEN, AFS-USA INC, MARCUS CHAMBERS, RON DESANTIS, DOES 1 - 30, ANN HORST, REBECCA HORST, TODD HORST, JOHN LEDBETTER, CHARLIE MARELLO, ASHLEY MOODY, DEBORAH MURPHY, ADAM NIXON, MARY POLSON, MARK STANLEY, THE SCHOOL BOARD OFFICE OF OKALOOSA COUNTY FLORIDA, DANIEL WOOTEN, filed by CHRISTOPHER J BRADLEY. (No service copies). (mb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint (No service copies), #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to HOPE T CANNON. (mb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
