MOORER v. QUEEN ELIZABETH et al
| CLEVEN MOORER |
| QUEEN ELIZABETH, VATICAN and PARLIAMENT |
| 3:2021cv00874 |
| June 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| HOPE T CANNON |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint. (No objections filed.) (alb) |
Filing 5
ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint. This case be DISMISSED as frivolous. - R&R flag set Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 7/16/2021. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 8/13/2021. (alb)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 7/16/2021. (alb)
|
| Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se Litigant. (alb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint, #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to HOPE T CANNON. (alb) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by CLEVEN MOORER. (alb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PARLIAMENT, QUEEN ELIZABETH, VATICAN, filed by CLEVEN MOORER. (alb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
