EVANS v. JOSEPH
| DANDRE DSHON EVANS |
| M V JOSEPH |
| 3:2021cv01492 |
| October 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MICHAEL J FRANK |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 CLERK'S JUDGMENT pursuant to #7 Order Adopting Report and Recommendation. (jfj) |
Filing 7
ORDER. The magistrate judge's #5 Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. Evans's habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. 2241, ECF No. #1 , is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. The clerk of the court shall close the case file. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 12/03/21. (jfj)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #6 Objection to Report and Recommendations. (jfj) |
| Filing 6 OBJECTION to #5 Report and Recommendations by DANDRE DSHON EVANS. (jfj) |
| Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Because the District Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain Evans's claims, the undersigned respectfully RECOMMENDS that: Evans's habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. 2241, Doc. #1 , be DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. The clerk of the court close the case file. (Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 12/2/2021.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 11/4/2021. (jcw) |
| Filing 4 Habeas Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number FLN3-14956. Fee status updated to paid. (mb) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The clerk of the court shall send to Plaintiff a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis for use by prisoners. On or before 11/8/2021, Plaintiff shall: a. pay $5.00; or b. submit a fully-completed motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis for use by prisoners. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 10/25/2021. (jcw)(Form sent as ordered.)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #3 Order, 4 Habeas Filing Fee Received. (mb) |
| Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se (jcw) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (jcw) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by DANDRE DSHON EVANS. (Filing fee was not paid. No service copies filed.) (jcw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: EVANS v. JOSEPH | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: DANDRE DSHON EVANS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: M V JOSEPH | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
