BYAMUKAMA v. 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff: NEBBATY BYAMUKAMA
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Case Number: 3:2022cv23661
Filed: November 28, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: HOPE T CANNON
Referring Judge: M CASEY RODGERS
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 28, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Designated Forum District of Minnesota by NEBBATY BYAMUKAMA (BARTLETT, TAYLOR)
November 28, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (BARTLETT, TAYLOR)
November 28, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 3M COMPANY ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLNDC-7576133.), filed by NEBBATY BYAMUKAMA. (BARTLETT, TAYLOR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BYAMUKAMA v. 3M COMPANY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NEBBATY BYAMUKAMA
Represented By: TAYLOR CHRISTOPHER BARTLETT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?