MCCLAIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
| CHARLES MCCLAIN |
| 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO LLC and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC |
| 3:2023cv17894 |
| July 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| HOPE T CANNON |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ORDER. This Order addresses the plaintiffs identified on Exhibit A who failed to submit the requisite military service documentation by the court-imposed deadlines. At this point in the litigation, these plaintiffs have had sufficient time to submit these forms, however, the Court will grant them one final opportunity to submit their DD214 forms by September 1, 2023. Failure to comply by this deadline will result in dismissal with prejudice as it will be considered a willful and repeated violation of the Courts orders. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 8/25/2023. (erl)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLNDC-7962659.), filed by CHARLES MCCLAIN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (SEEGER, CHRISTOPHER) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
