NGUYEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
| TERRY NGUYEN |
| 3M COMPANY, AEARO HOLDING LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC |
| 3:2024cv00420 |
| September 5, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| HOPE T CANNON |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 RESPONSE by TERRY NGUYEN re #5 Order (djb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #6 Response RE #5 Order (djb) |
Filing 5
ORDER - The Court ordered Nguyen to show cause by September 23, 2024, for why his case against 3M should not be dismissed on statute of limitations grounds See ECF No. #2 . Nguyen failed to comply and on October 2, 2024, the Court dismissed his case with prejudice. The Court will excuse his noncompliance on this one occasion. Nguyen has until October 14, 2024, to show cause why his case should not be dismissed on statute of limitations grounds. The Clerk is directed to REOPEN Nguyen's case. The Settlement Administrator is also directed to reopen Nguyen's MDL Centrality account. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 10/7/2024. (djb) Modified on 10/7/2024 to note Order mailed to plaintiff (djb).
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER - Nguyen was warned that his failure to strictly comply with the Court orders would result in dismissal of his case with prejudice. Due to the advanced stage of this litigation, and Nguyen's failure to comply with Court orders, his case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 10/2/2024. (order sent as directed) (djb)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #2 Order to Show Cause, (no response) (djb) |
|
Filing 3
**DISREGARD DUPLICATE DOCKET ENTRY**ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Plaintiff is required to show cause why his case should not be dismissed on statute of limitations grounds. The response is limited to no more than 8,000 words and must be filed within 14 days from the date of this Order. Within 30 days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff must serve on Defense Counsel a signed affidavit providing the information outlined in the Order. Plaintiff's failure to strictly comply with this Order, and more generally the requirements of CMO 57, will result in dismissal of his case with prejudice. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 09/09/2024. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Show Cause Response due by 9/23/2024.) (mah) Modified on 9/10/2024 (mah).
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER re #1 Complaint. As an initial matter and consistent with CMO 57, Nguyen is required to show cause why his case should not be dismissed on statute of limitations grounds. His response is limited to no more than 8,000 words. Nguyen must file his response within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order. (Show Cause Response due by 9/23/2024.) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - CMO 57) Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 9/9/2024. (jcw)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint (djb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC (Filing fee $405.), filed by TERRY NGUYEN. (djb) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/6/2024: #1 Exhibit Sealed) (djb). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
