GORHAM v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION

GORHAM v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION

Plaintiff:	DOUGLAS GORHAM
Defendant:	FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION
Case Number:	4:2009cv00201
Filed:	June 2, 2009
Court:	U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office:	Tallahassee Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	MAURICE M PAUL
Presiding Judge:	WILLIAM C SHERRILL
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 4, 2009	Filing 14 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 12 Report and Recommendation. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 12/04/2009. The Amended Complaint, Doc. 10 , is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2). The Clerk is directed to note on the docket that this cause was dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). (kdm)
November 10, 2009	Filing 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 10 Amended Complaint filed by DOUGLAS GORHAM :It is respectfully RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's amended complaint, doc. 10 , be DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be gran ted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), and that the order adopting this report and recommendation direct the Clerk of Court to note on the docket that this cause was dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 12/8/2009.R&R flag set. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE WILLIAM C SHERRILL, JR on 11/10/09. (dlt)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 4, 2009

Filing 14 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 12 Report and Recommendation. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 12/04/2009. The Amended Complaint, Doc. 10 , is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2). The Clerk is directed to note on the docket that this cause was dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). (kdm)

November 10, 2009

Filing 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 10 Amended Complaint filed by DOUGLAS GORHAM :It is respectfully RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's amended complaint, doc. 10 , be DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be gran ted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), and that the order adopting this report and recommendation direct the Clerk of Court to note on the docket that this cause was dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 12/8/2009.R&R flag set. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE WILLIAM C SHERRILL, JR on 11/10/09. (dlt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GORHAM v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: DOUGLAS GORHAM
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?