XU v. LANGAN ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff: BING XU
Defendant: LANGAN ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Case Number: 4:2009cv00277
Filed: July 30, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Tallahassee Office
County: Leon
Presiding Judge: STEPHAN P MICKLE
Presiding Judge: WILLIAM C SHERRILL
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: Case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE STEPHAN P MICKLE on 5/12/2010. (jws)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: XU v. LANGAN ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BING XU
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LANGAN ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Represented By: B TYLER WHITE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?