FURLOW v. STATE OF FLORIDA'S MASONIC BROTHERHOOD UNION

Defendant: STATE OF FLORIDA'S MASONIC BROTHERHOOD UNION
Plaintiff: ELGINE WILSON FURLOW
Case Number: 4:2013cv00223
Filed: April 19, 2013
Court: Florida Northern District Court
Office: Tallahassee Office
County: Alachua
Presiding Judge: ROBERT L HINKLE
Referring Judge: CHARLES A STAMPELOS
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 11, 2013 6 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER OF DISMISSAL - The report and recommendation 3 is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court's opinion. The clerk must enter judgment stating, "This case is DISMISSED without prejudice." Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 6/11/2013. (dlt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: FURLOW v. STATE OF FLORIDA'S MASONIC BROTHERHOOD UNION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STATE OF FLORIDA'S MASONIC BROTHERHOOD UNION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ELGINE WILSON FURLOW
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.