MELENDEZ v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
| WILLIAM HOWER MELENDEZ |
| SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LIBERTY C I ADMINISTRATION, BRANTLY, SYKES and JONES |
| 4:2013cv00597 |
| October 28, 2013 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Tallahassee Office |
| Liberty |
| WILLIAM STAFFORD |
| CHARLES A STAMPELOS |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDER ADOPTING 20 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - The order doc. 4 granting the plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is VACATED. The plaintiff's motion doc. 2 for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. Any monies collected from the plaintiff to date shall be retained by the court as a sanction for the plaintiff's failure to honestly disclose his prior filings. The plaintiff's complaint and this action are DISMISSED WITHOUT PRE JUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) as an abuse of the judicial process because the plaintiff did not truthfully and fully disclose his prior litigation history. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: "All claims are dismissed without prejudice." The clerk shall note on the docket that this case was dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by SENIOR JUDGE WILLIAM STAFFORD on 3/26/2014. (dlt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
