THOMPSON V SYKES
MATTHEW JOHN THOMPSON |
J SYKES, J STRENGTH and GOFF |
4:2015cv00253 |
May 7, 2015 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
Tallahassee Office |
Wakulla |
MARK E WALKER |
CHARLES A STAMPELOS |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 57 ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DIRECTING CLERK TO REASSIGN CASE - The 56 report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as this Court's opinion as follows: Plaintiff's motion for summar y judgment, ECF No. 47 , is DENIED. Defendants' second amended motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 53 , is DENIED in part because there is a genuine dispute of material fact as to the First and Eighth Amendment claims. Defendants' mot ion for summary judgment is GRANTED as to the separate conspiracy claim and claims presented against the Defendants in their official capacities. This case shall proceed against the Defendants in their individual capacities for nominal damages o nly. The Clerk is directed to reassign this action to U.S. District Judge Robert Hinkle inasmuch as Judge Hinkle is presiding over Case No. 4:14cv465-RH with common questions of issue and fact. Judge Hinkle shall make the determination whether to consolidate the cases. ORDER REASSIGNING CASE - Case reassigned to JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE all further proceedings. JUDGE MARK E WALKER no longer assigned to case. Signed by JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 2/23/2017. (cle) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.