BROWN v. STATE OF FLORIDA
EVALOIS BROWN |
STATE OF FLORIDA |
4:2018cv00419 |
September 4, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
CHARLES A STAMPELOS |
MARK E WALKER |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER notified that action is needed re: #6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The deadline to file Objections to the R&R has expired. No Objections have been filed. (cle) |
Filing 6 ORDER and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - ORDER: Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. #5 , is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall file the complaint without requiring payment of the filing fee. RECOMMENDATION: It is respectfully RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's amended complaint, ECF No. #4 , be DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. R&R flag set. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS on 10/3/2018. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 10/31/2018. (cle) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS notified that action is needed re: #4 Amended Complaint and #5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to CHARLES A STAMPELOS. (cle) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by EVALOIS BROWN. (cle) |
Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against STATE OF FLORIDA, filed by EVALOIS BROWN. (cle) |
Filing 3 ORDER. The Clerk of Court shall forward to Plaintiff an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis for use by non-prisoner litigants, and a civil rights complaint form. Plaintiff has until 10/11/2018 to either: (1) file a motion requesting leave to proceed in forma pauperis, supported by a signed financial affidavit, or (2) pay the full amount of the filing fee ($400.00). Plaintiff has until 10/11/2018 to file an "amended" complaint on the form provided to her by the Clerk of this Court. The Clerk of Court shall return this file upon receipt of Plaintiff's compliance with this Order, or no later than 10/11/2018. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS on 9/10/2018. (kjw) **Civil Rights Complaint form and IFP Motion forwarded to Plaintiff.** |
Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se. (cle) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS notified that action is needed re: #1 Complaint. (cle) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against STATE OF FLORIDA, filed by EVALOIS BROWN. (cle) *** No Service Copy provided. No Filing Fee paid and no IFP filed. *** |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: BROWN v. STATE OF FLORIDA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: STATE OF FLORIDA | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: EVALOIS BROWN | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.