BROOKS v. MILLER
| ERIC K BROOKS |
| D MILLER |
| 4:2019cv00524 |
| October 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| CHARLES A STAMPELOS |
| MARK E WALKER |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Set Deadlines per ORDER #9 : Check waiver form status by 1/21/2020. Refer file to Chambers upon filing of waiver form, notice of appearance, answer or other response to the complaint, or nolater than 2/10/2020. (blb) |
Filing 9
ORDER. Plaintiff's motion of clarification, ECF No. #8 , is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall prepare and complete USM-285 forms, waiver of service forms (NUSM-1 waiver form), and two AO-399 forms for Defendant Officer D. Miller, #375. The Clerk of Court shall provide the prepared forms along with a copy of this Order for the Defendant, and the service copy of the complaint (ECF No. #1 ) to the United States Marshals Service (USMS). Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3), service shall be made by the USMS and the costs of such service is advanced by the United States. The Clerk of Court shall refer this file if a waiver form is returned for insufficient address or for similar reason, if service on the Defendant is returned unexecuted, or if the USMS has filed a statement of costs incurred for making personal service. Defendant Miller shall have 60 days in which to file a response to the complaint if the waiver form is returned to the Court within 30 days. Counsel for Defendant Miller shall file a notice of appearance within twenty (20) days of the date of service or waiver of service. After a response to the complaint has been filed, any paper submitted for filing which does not contain a certificate of service shall be returned by the Clerk and disregarded by the Court. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the Clerk shall forward to Plaintiff a form for consenting to trial by the magistrate judge, with the case number written on it. The Clerk shall refer this file upon the filing of a waiver form, a notice of appearance, an answer or other response to the complaint, or no later than February 10, 2020. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS on 12/10/19. (blb) *Forms provided as directed*
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS notified that action is needed Re: #8 MOTION of clarification. Referred to CHARLES A STAMPELOS. (blb) |
| Filing 8 MOTION OF CLARIFICATION by ERIC K BROOKS. (blb) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER. Plaintiff's motion for placement in pro bono program, ECF No. #3 , construed as a motion for the appointment of counsel, is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS on 11/21/19. (blb)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER. The Clerk of Court shall forward to Plaintiff another civil rights complaint form for use by state prisoners. Plaintiff has until 12/23/2019, to file a response to this Order which clarifies the basis for his current incarceration. Should Plaintiff desire to eliminate the false arrest claim raised in the initial complaint, Plaintiff shall have until 12/23/2019, in which to file an amended civil rights complaint. If Plaintiff does not want to continue this case, a Rule 41(a) notice of voluntary dismissal must be filed by the same deadline. The Clerk of Court shall return this file upon receipt of Plaintiff's compliance with this Order, or no later than 12/23/2019. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS on 11/21/19. (blb) *Forms Provided as Directed*
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER GRANTING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS. Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. #2 , is GRANTED to the extent the filing fee does not have to be prepaid. The Clerk of Court shall mail a copy of this Order with appropriate cover letter, to: Department of Corrections, Office of the General Counsel, 501 South Calhoun Street, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2500. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS on 11/21/19. (blb) *Order Forwarded as Directed*
|
| Filing 4 Notice to Pro Se (blb) |
| Filing 3 MOTION FOR PLACEMENT IN LAWYER PROBONO PROGRAM by ERIC K BROOKS. (blb) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by ERIC K BROOKS. (blb) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/20/2019: #1 Supplement INMATE BANK ACCOUNT) (blb). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against D MILLER, filed by ERIC K BROOKS. (blb) *1 Copy provided, No fee paid* |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint, #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel. Referred to CHARLES A STAMPELOS. (blb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: BROOKS v. MILLER | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ERIC K BROOKS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: D MILLER | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
