LUSTER v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS SECRETARY
| Reginald Langston Luster |
| FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS SECRETARY |
| 4:2019cv00541 |
| October 31, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MICHAEL J FRANK |
| MARK E WALKER |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER re #10 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The Clerk of Court shall furnish a copy of the amended petition (Doc. #10 ) and this order to Respondent and the Attorney General of the State of Florida. Within NINETY (90) DAYS from the docketing date of this order, Respondent shall file an answer as directed by this order.( Answer due by 3/17/2020.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 12/18/2019. (jcw)(cc: Respondent; Attorney General)
|
| Filing 10 AMENDED WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS against FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS SECRETARY, filed by REGINALD LANGSTON LUSTER. (HAMRICK, JOSEPH) (Main Document 10 replaced on 12/12/2019. #8 would not open) (blb). Modified on 12/12/2019 to correct title of document (jcw). (2) courtesy copies received in mail on 12/17/2019 (blb). |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #10 Amended Complaint, #9 Notice of Filing. (blb) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of mailing Amended Complaint to Clerk by REGINALD LANGSTON LUSTER re #10 Amended Complaint (HAMRICK, JOSEPH) Modified Amended Complaint ECF# on 12/12/2019 (blb). |
| Filing 8 DUPLICATE ENTRY done at #10 (PDF would not open)FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS SECRETARY, filed by REGINALD LANGSTON LUSTER. (HAMRICK, JOSEPH) Modified on 12/12/2019 (blb). |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Amend. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on December 6, 2019. (jw)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #6 MOTION for Extension of Time to Amend #2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus . Referred to MICHAEL J FRANK. (jcw) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to Amend #2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by REGINALD LANGSTON LUSTER. (HAMRICK, JOSEPH) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #3 Notice of Filing, #4 Notice of Filing. (jcw) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. Within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of this order, Luster shall file an amended petition that complies with the above requirements. The amended petition must be accompanied by two identical service copies of same. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 11/5/2019. (jcw)
|
| Set Deadlines/Hearings Amended Pleadings due by 12/5/2019. (jcw) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE (second) of filing appendix to habeas petition by REGINALD LANGSTON LUSTER re #2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Attachments: #1 Appendix 8- Pre-trial & trial filings, #2 Appendix 9- Transcript of stand-your-ground hearing, #3 Appendix 10- Transcript of motion for new trial hearing, #4 Appendix 11- Transcript of first jury trial - hung jury, #5 Appendix 12- Transcript of second jury trial - verdict) (HAMRICK, JOSEPH) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Filing Appendix by REGINALD LANGSTON LUSTER re #2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Attachments: #1 Appendix Postconviction State Appeal Filings, #2 Appendix Postconviction Appeal ROA, part 1, #3 Appendix Postconviction Appeal ROA, part 2, #4 Appendix Postconviction Appeal ROA, part 3, #5 Appendix Postconviction Appeal ROA, part 4, #6 Appendix Postconviction Appeal ROA, part 5, #7 Appendix Postconviction Appeal ROA, part 6) (HAMRICK, JOSEPH) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #1 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages in Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 USC 2254, #2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Referred to MICHAEL J FRANK. (jcw) |
| Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number AFLNDC-4681903.), filed by REGINALD LANGSTON LUSTER. (HAMRICK, JOSEPH) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages in Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 USC 2254 by Reginald Langston Luster. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Propose Habeas Petition) (HAMRICK, JOSEPH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: LUSTER v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS SECRETARY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS SECRETARY | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Reginald Langston Luster | |
| Represented By: | JOSEPH S HAMRICK |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
