ORTIZ v. COLLINS et al
| ISMAEL LUIS ORTIZ |
| PEAVY, WEATHERSPOON, GRAHAM, P JOHNSON, M ANDERSON, A JOHNS, STALNAKER, JULIE L JONES, D S COLLINS, PRIDE, A PRESEAV and S BEARDEN |
| 4:2020cv00007 |
| January 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| HOPE T CANNON |
| WILLIAM STAFFORD |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER REQUIRING AMENDED COMPLAINT. The clerk shall forward to Plaintiff a civil rights complaint form for use by state prisoners in actions under 42 U.S.C. 1983. Within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, Plaintiff shall file either a notice of voluntary dismissal or an amended complaint. (Amended Complaint due by 3/30/2020.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 2/27/2020. (form to Pla) (sdw)
|
| Filing 7 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: Re #1 Complaint filed by ISMAEL LUIS ORTIZ. (received 1 service copy) (sdw) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint. (sdw) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Amended MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Because Plaintiff has funds in his inmate account, the clerk shall assess Plaintiff an initial partial filing fee. Plaintiff must file an initial partial filing fee of $25.70. As funds become available in Plaintiff's inmate account, Plaintiff is required to make monthly payments of twenty (20) percent of the preceding month's income. The clerk shall mail a copy of this order with the appropriate cover letter to the Department of Corrections. The clerk shall refer the complaint (ECF Doc. #1 ) to chambers for preliminary screening under 28 U.S.C. 1915A, 1915(e)(2). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 2/11/2020. (sdw)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by ISMAEL LUIS ORTIZ. (sdw) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to HOPE T CANNON. (sdw) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #4 Order. (no filing fee/IFP motion) (sdw) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER. Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Doc. #2 ) is DENIED without prejudice. The clerk shall send Plaintiff a complete set of forms needed for filing a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. This case number should be written on the forms. Within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this order, Plaintiff shall either file a completed motion to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the $400.00 filing fee. (IFP motion/Fee due by 2/3/2020.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 1/13/2020. (form to Pla) (sdw)
|
| Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se litigant ISMAEL LUIS ORTIZ. (sdw) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #1 Complaint. Referred to HOPE T CANNON. (sdw) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by ISMAEL LUIS ORTIZ. (sdw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against M ANDERSON, S BEARDEN, D S COLLINS, GRAHAM, A JOHNS, P JOHNSON, JULIE L JONES, PEAVY, A PRESEAV, PRIDE, STALNAKER, and WEATHERSPOON filed by ISMAEL LUIS ORTIZ. (no service copies) (sdw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
