MABREY v. WAFFLE HOUSE INC
| DANA MABREY |
| WAFFLE HOUSE, INC. and WAFFLE HOUSE INC |
| 4:2020cv00099 |
| February 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MARTIN A FITZPATRICK |
| WILLIAM STAFFORD |
| CHARLES A STAMPELOS |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK for all further proceedings. MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS no longer assigned to case. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 4/3/2020. **Please use the new judge's initials for all future filings: 4:20cv99-WS/MAF. (amm)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO STAY PENDING ARBITRATION - Defendant's unopposed motion (ECF No. #11 ) to stay pending arbitration is GRANTED. Defendant shall advise the court when arbitration proceedings have been completed. This action is STAYED until such time as arbitration proceedings have been completed. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE WILLIAM STAFFORD on 3/27/2020. (cle)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of SENIOR JUDGE WILLIAM STAFFORD notified that action is needed re: #11 MOTION to Stay - UNOPPOSED. (cle) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Stay UNOPPOSED by WAFFLE HOUSE INC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (WHITE, B) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME - Defendant's second unopposed motion (ECF No. #9 ) for extension of time is GRANTED. Defendant shall have up to and including 3/23/2020, to respond toPlaintiff's complaint. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE WILLIAM STAFFORD on 3/10/2020. (cle)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of SENIOR JUDGE WILLIAM STAFFORD notified that action is needed re: #9 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response. (cle) |
| Filing 9 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply UNOPPOSED by WAFFLE HOUSE INC. (WHITE, B) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by ERIKA ESAN GOODMAN on behalf of All Plaintiffs (GOODMAN, ERIKA) |
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement/Certificate of Interested Persons by WAFFLE HOUSE INC. (WHITE, B) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME - Defendant's unopposed motion (ECF No. #5 ) for extension of time is GRANTED. Defendant shall have up to and including 3/9/2020, to respond to Plaintiff's complaint. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE WILLIAM STAFFORD on 2/27/2020. (cle)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of SENIOR JUDGE WILLIAM STAFFORD notified that action is needed re: #5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response. (cle) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply UNOPPOSED by WAFFLE HOUSE INC. (WHITE, B) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by TODD RICHARD DOBRY on behalf of WAFFLE HOUSE INC (DOBRY, TODD) |
|
Filing 3
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER - Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set for 3/6/2020. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 4/6/2020. Discovery due by 6/19/2020. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE WILLIAM STAFFORD on 2/21/2020. (cle)
|
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (WHITE, B) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by WAFFLE HOUSE, INC. from CIRCUIT COURT, SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, LEON COUNTY, FL, case number 2019-CA-002586. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AFLNDC-4881442.), filed by WAFFLE HOUSE, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (WHITE, B) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
