SILVA v. HINKLE et al
| DANIEL JAMES SILVA |
| MICHAEL J FRANK, ALLEN C WINSOR, ROBERT L HINKLE, CHARLES A STAMPELOS and MARTIN A FITZPATRICK |
| 4:2021cv00095 |
| February 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MICHAEL J FRANK |
| ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
| MARK E WALKER |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER CLOSING FILE - In response to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, ECF No. #8 , Plaintiff moves to dismiss this case, ECF No. #9 . This Court construes Plaintiff's motion as a notice of voluntary dismissal, which is effective without an order. The Clerk shall close the file. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 4/1/2021. (cle)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER notified that action is needed re: #8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and #9 Response/Objection to Report and Recommendations. (cle) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE/OBJECTION TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (titled, "Motion to Dismiss"), to #8 Report and Recommendations, by DANIEL JAMES SILVA. (mb) |
| Filing 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - RECOMMENDED: That this case be DISMISSED with prejudice as frivolous. That the clerk be directed to close the file. R&R flag set. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 3/29/2021. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 4/26/2021. (mb) |
|
Filing 7
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - ORDERED: Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. #2 ) is GRANTED. Fee status updated to in forma pauperis. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 3/29/2021. (mb)
|
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT by DANIEL JAMES SILVA. (mb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed re: #5 Order of Recusal. (cle) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER OF RECUSAL - The Clerk's Office shall assign another Magistrate Judge to this action based upon my recusal. MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK recused. Case reassigned to MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY for all further proceedings. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK on 2/19/2021. Motions referred to ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY. (cle)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK notified that action is needed Re: #4 Order Reassigning Case, #1 Complaint, #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (jcw) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER - I hereby disqualify myself from handling any matter or proceedings in the above-styled case. The clerk of the court is directed to randomly reassign this case to another United States Magistrate Judge. The clerk also shall change the docket and case number to reflect the reassignment. (Case reassigned to MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK for all further proceedings.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 2/18/2021. (jcw)
|
| Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se (jcw) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint, #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to MICHAEL J FRANK. (jcw) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by DANIEL JAMES SILVA. (jcw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by DANIEL JAMES SILVA. (Filing fee was not paid. No service copies filed.) (jcw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
