JENKINS v. INCH
Petitioner: JOSEPH R JENKINS
Respondent: MARK S INCH
Case Number: 4:2021cv00219
Filed: May 27, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: MICHAEL J FRANK
Referring Judge: ALLEN C WINSOR
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 12, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by BARBARA CATHERINE DEBELIUS-ENEMARK, I on behalf of MARK S INCH (DEBELIUS-ENEMARK, BARBARA)
June 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The Clerk of Court shall furnish a copy of the petition, supporting memorandum, and this order to the Respondent and the Attorney General of the State of Florida. Within NINETY DAYS from the docketing date of this order, Respondent shall file an answer as directed by this order. (Order and petition mailed via certified mail.) (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 9/22/2021). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 6/24/2021. (alb)
June 23, 2021 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed re: 4 Two Service Copies filed. (cle)
June 21, 2021 Filing 4 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT - Per #3 Order, the Petitioner's attorney has filed two service copies of Petition For Writ of Habeas Corpus including the Memorandum in Support. (cle)
June 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS (6/28/2021) from the date of this order, Petitioner shall submit to the court either two identical service copies of his petition and supporting memorandum, or payment in the amount of $62.00 for the court to make copies for him. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 6/14/2021. (jcw)
May 27, 2021 Filing 2 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: The parties in the above-referenced case were added to the docket incorrectly and will be corrected by the clerk. Party names are to be entered in all caps and without punctuation. For future reference, please review the procedure for adding/creating new parties in the "Style Guide for Electronic Case Filing" and/or chapter 10 of the "CM/ECF Attorney User's Guide," available at www.flnd.uscourts.gov. (jcw)
May 27, 2021 Filing 1 First PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number AFLNDC-6110664.), filed by Joseph R. JENKINS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement Memo of Law) (COLLINS, DAVID)
May 27, 2021 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (jcw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: JENKINS v. INCH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MARK S INCH
Represented By: BARBARA CATHERINE DEBELIUS-ENEMARK, I
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JOSEPH R JENKINS
Represented By: DAVID WALTER COLLINS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?