LAGRANDEUR v. STOKES et al
JEFFREY LAGRANDEUR |
J STOKES, DOC SUWANEE C I, J BURNHAM and D A EDWARDS |
4:2021cv00294 |
July 15, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
MARTIN A FITZPATRICK |
MARK E WALKER |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Set Deadlines/Hearings Fee due by 10/12/2021. (rcb) |
Filing 8 ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING #7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The report and recommendation, ECF No. #7 , is accepted and adopted as this Courts opinion. Plaintiffs in forma pauperis motion, ECF No. #6 , and his prior consent form, ECF No. 2, are DENIED. Plaintiff must pay the filing fee on or before October 12, 2021. This case is REMANDED to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings consistent with this Order. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 9/9/2021. (rcb) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK notified that action is needed Re: #8 ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING #7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Referred to MARTIN A FITZPATRICK. (rcb) |
Filing 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. It is respectfully RECOMMENDED that: (1) Plaintiffs in forma pauperis motion, ECF No. #6 , and his prior consent form, ECF No. #2 , be DENIED because Plaintiffs account statement reveals he has sufficient funds to pay the filing fee for this case; (2) Plaintiff be provided 30 days in which to pay the $400.00 filing fee; and (3) this case be REMANDED for further proceedings. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 9/14/2021. R&R flag set. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK on 08/17/2021. (rcb) Modified to edit title on 8/20/2021 (rcb). |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK notified that action is needed Re: #5 UNTITLED DOCUMENT NOT SIGNED, #6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with attachments. Referred to MARTIN A FITZPATRICK. (rcb) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with attachments by JEFFREY LAGRANDEUR. (rcb) |
Filing 5 UNTITLED DOCUMENT NOT SIGNED by JEFFREY LAGRANDEUR (rcb) |
Filing 4 ORDER. The Clerk of Court shall forward to Plaintiff an application packet for requesting leave to proceed in forma pauperis by state prisoners. Plaintiff has until 8/19/2021, to either: (1) file an amended in forma pauperis motion supported by a computer printout of all transactions in his inmate bank account for 6-month period of time prior to case initiation and a signed prisoner consent form, or (2) pay the full amount ($402.00) of the filing fee. The Clerk of Court shall return this file upon receipt of Plaintiff's compliance with this Order, or no later than 8/19/2021. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK on 07/19/2021. (rcb)**IFP Motion Forwarded As Directed** |
Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se (rcb) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK notified that action is needed Re: #2 PRISONER CONSENT FORM AND FINANCIAL CERTIFICATE, #1 COMPLAINT Referred to MARTIN A FITZPATRICK. (rcb) |
Filing 2 PRISONER CONSENT FORM AND FINANCIAL CERTIFICATE WITH ATTACHMENT (Pages 1-2 IFP Motion not attached) by JEFFREY LAGRANDEUR. (rcb) Modified on 7/16/2021 (rcb). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against J BURNHAM, DOC SUWANEE C I, J STOKES, filed by JEFFREY LAGRANDEUR. (rcb)**No service copies provided** |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.