WRIGHT v. UNKNOWN OFFICER IN CHARGE OIC et al
Plaintiff: ROBERT LEE WRIGHT, III
Defendant: UNKNOWN OFFICER IN CHARGE OIC and NURSES OF STATE CORRECTIONS FACILITY
Case Number: 4:2024cv00310
Filed: August 8, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: MARTIN A FITZPATRICK
Referring Judge: MARK E WALKER
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 9, 2024 Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT entered pursuant to #5 Order Adopting Report and Recommendation. (sjb)
September 9, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - The report and recommendation, ECF No. #4 , is accepted and adopted as this Court's opinion. Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. #2 , is DENIED because Plaintiff is barred from proceeding with in forma pauperis status pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, "Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED without prejudice." The Clerk shall not on the docket that this case was dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) and close the file. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 9/9/24. (sjb)
August 12, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - It is respectfully RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. #2 , be DENIED because Plaintiff is barred from proceeding with in forma pauperis status pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g), that this case be DISMISSED without prejudice, and the Order adopting this Report and Recommendation should direct the Clerk of Court to note on the docket that this case was dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK on 8/12/24. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 9/9/2024. (sjb)
August 9, 2024 Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se (sjb)
August 9, 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint, #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to MARTIN A FITZPATRICK. (sjb)
August 8, 2024 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by ROBERT LEE WRIGHT. (sjb)
August 8, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against NURSES OF STATE CORRECTIONS FACILITY, UNKNOWN OFFICER IN CHARGE OIC, filed by ROBERT LEE WRIGHT. (sjb)(No service copies provided. IFP provided.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WRIGHT v. UNKNOWN OFFICER IN CHARGE OIC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNKNOWN OFFICER IN CHARGE OIC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NURSES OF STATE CORRECTIONS FACILITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ROBERT LEE WRIGHT, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?