MCCONLEY v. WELLS FARGO BANK NA et al
| FORREST CRAIG MCCONLEY |
| WELLS FARGO BANK NA and WELLS FARGO ADVISORS |
| 4:2024cv00484 |
| December 3, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MARTIN A FITZPATRICK |
| MARK E WALKER |
| Other Fraud |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MOTION to Extend Time TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (UNOPPOSED) by WELLS FARGO ADVISORS. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (SOTO, SARA) |
Filing 9
ORDER. The Clerk of Court shall return this file upon receipt of an answeror other response to the complaint from the Defendants, upon the filing ofan executed or unexecuted summons, or no later than 3/4/2025. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK on 1/31/2025. (rcb)
|
| Filing 8 LETTER/NOTICE TO THE COURT WITH ATTACHMENTS (rcb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK notified that action is needed Re: #8 LETTER/NOTICE TO THE COURT WITH ATTACHMENTS. (rcb) |
| ACTION *NO LONGER* REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK notified that action is no longer needed. **ACKNOWLEDGMENT DOCKETED IN THE WRONG CASE** Re: #7 Acknowledgment of Service-Ricky Dixon. (rcb) Modified to edit docket text-acknowledgment should have been filed in 4:24cv454 on 1/27/2025 (rcb). |
| Filing 7 **PLEASE DISREGARD THIS ENTRY-DOCKETED IN THE WRONG CASE**ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed as RICKY DIXON RE: #5 Order. (rcb) Modified to edit docket text-acknowledgment should have been filed in 4:24-cv454 on 1/27/2025 (rcb). |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to WELLS FARGO ADVISORS, WELLS FARGO BANK NA. (rcb) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER. The Clerk of Court issue a summons for each named Defendant, and deliver the summonses along with this Order to Plaintiff, who shall be responsible for prompt service of the summons and complaint upon the Defendants. The Clerk shall also forward to Plaintiff the AO-398 Form (Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waiver Service of a Summons) and two copies of the AO-399 Form (Waiver of the Service of Summons) for each Defendant which may be used if Plaintiff decides to request that Defendants waive formal service of the complaint. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the Clerk of Court shall forward to Plaintiff a form for consenting to trial by the magistrate judge, with this case number written on it. The Clerk of Court shall return this file upon receipt of an answer or other response to the complaint from the Defendants, upon the filing of an executed or unexecuted summons, or no later than 2/3/2025. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK on 12/4/2024. (rcb)*SUMMONSES ISSUED/FORMS FORWARDED AS DIRECTED**
|
| Filing 4 Notice to Pro Se (rcb) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee: $ 405.00, receipt number 400003941. Fee status updated to paid. (rcb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK notified that action is needed Re: #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #1 Complaint. (rcb) Modified to remove referral language on 12/5/2024 (rcb). |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (rcb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against WELLS FARGO ADVISORS, WELLS FARGO BANK NA, filed by FORREST CRAIG MCCONLEY. (Attachments: #1 COVER LETTER) (rcb)**NO SERVICE COPY RECEIVED** |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
