OWNBY v. ASTRUE
DOUGLAS R OWNBY |
MICHAEL J ASTRUE |
5:2009cv00010 |
January 19, 2009 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW Office |
Gulf |
RICHARD SMOAK |
ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
None |
U.S. Government Defendant |
42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 37 ORDER ADOPTING 36 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ; granting 34 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 2/8/2012. (jcw) |
Filing 33 ORDER ADOPTING 32 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; granted 29 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 2/19/2010. (sea) |
Filing 32 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - That Pla's 29 MOTION for Attorney Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act be Granted as follows: Pla's counsel, Heather Freeman, is entitled to recover fees in the amount of $5 ,107.57 for representing Pla before the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (EAJA); the amount of attorney fees and hourly rates requested under the EAJA are reasonable; and the Commissio ner is directed to pay counsel that amount. Filing fee costs in the amount of $350.00 are also awarded, to be paid from the Judgment Fund of the United States Tresury. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 1/13/2010. **Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 2/10/2010. (laj) |
Filing 27 ORDER ADOPTING 26 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Dft's 24 MOTION to Remand is granted and the Commissioner's decision denying benefits is reversed. This case is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Defendant is ordered to conduct proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. The clerk is directed to enter final judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. The clerk is directed to administratively close this file. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 12/3/2009. (jcw) |
Filing 26 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - 1) That Dft's 24 MOTION to Remand be Granted and the Commissioner's decision denying benefits be Reversed. 2) That this case be Remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security pursuant to sen tence four of 42 U.S.C> § 405(g). 3) That the clerk be directed to enter final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 4) That the clerk be directed to administratively close this file. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 10/28/2009. ** Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 11/25/2009. (laj) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: OWNBY v. ASTRUE | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: MICHAEL J ASTRUE | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: DOUGLAS R OWNBY | |
Represented By: | HEATHER FREEMAN |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.