BOOSE v. ESP
Petitioner: MARK A BOOSE
Respondent: CHRISTOPHER ESP
Case Number: 5:2011cv00310
Filed: September 19, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Panama City Office
County: Bay
Presiding Judge: MAURICE M PAUL
Presiding Judge: ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 24, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re: 23 Report and Recommendation, and granting 19 MOTION to Dismiss habeas petition by CHRISTOPHER ESP. denying 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by MARK A BOOSE. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 8/24/12. (bkp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BOOSE v. ESP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: MARK A BOOSE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: CHRISTOPHER ESP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?