COLLIER v. TUCKER
Petitioner: BLAKE COLLIER
Respondent: KENNETH S TUCKER
Case Number: 5:2012cv00082
Filed: April 4, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Panama City Office
County: Bay
Presiding Judge: MAURICE M PAUL
Presiding Judge: ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER adopting 19 Report and Recommendation; denying 24 MOTION for Leave to Supplement/Expand the Record with Supporting Memorandum of Law. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 4/18/2013. The petition for writ of habeas corpus, Doc. 1 , is DENIED. No certificate of appealability is appropriate in this case. (kdm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: COLLIER v. TUCKER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: BLAKE COLLIER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: KENNETH S TUCKER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?