ELIE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Petitioner: EDDIE ELIE
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 5:2013cv00075
Filed: March 15, 2013
Court: Florida Northern District Court
Office: Panama City Office
County: Jackson
Presiding Judge: RICHARD SMOAK
Referring Judge: ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 25, 2013 13 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER approving 12 Report and Recommendation. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. The clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 9/25/2013. (jem)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ELIE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: EDDIE ELIE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.