CRUZ v. US DEPARTMENT OF IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE

Petitioner: JOSE CRUZ
Respondent: US DEPARTMENT OF IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE
Case Number: 5:2013cv00360
Filed: October 25, 2013
Court: Florida Northern District Court
Office: Panama City Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: LACEY A COLLIER
Referring Judge: GARY R JONES
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 1, 2014 12 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 8 Report and Recommendation. The 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus, is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction, and the clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 5/1/2014. (djb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CRUZ v. US DEPARTMENT OF IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JOSE CRUZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: US DEPARTMENT OF IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.