PC CELLULAR INC et al v. SPRINT SOLUTIONS INC et al
Plaintiff: CHADDIE SULEIMAN, SOUTHEAST CORPORATE STORES and PC CELLULAR INC
Defendant: JERRY BLAND, VIRGIN MOBILE USA LP, BOOST MOBILE LLC, SPRINT SOLUTIONS INC, VIP WIRELESS INC, VIP HOLDINGS LLC, PATRICK GROSKOPK and JACK HUSTON
Case Number: 5:2014cv00237
Filed: September 17, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Panama City Office
County: Hillsborough
Presiding Judge: GARY R JONES
Presiding Judge: RICHARD SMOAK
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER granting the relief requested in 29 & 30 Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike. The clerk is directed to STRIKE Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint (Doc. 24 ) from the record. All of Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The clerk is directed to close the case. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 1/8/2015. (jem)
November 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER: The relief requested in Defendants VIP Wireless, Inc., and VIP Holdings, LLC's Motion to Dismiss or for a More Definite Statement (Doc. 5 ); and Defendants Sprint Solutions, Inc., Boost Mobile, LLC, Virgin Mobile USA, L.P., and Jerry Bland's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint (Doc. 7 ) (to the extent it seeks dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)) are GRANTED. Counts I, II, and VIII of Plaintiff's Complaint are DISMISS ED WITHOUT PREJUDICE with leave to amend not later than 11/19/2014. Counts III, IV, V, VI, and VII are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE without leave to amend. Defendant's, Jack Huston and Patrick Groskopf's, Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 6 ); Defendants Sprint Solutions, Inc., Boost Mobile, LLC, Virgin Mobile USA, L.P., and Jerry Blands Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint (Doc. 7 ) (to the extent it seeks dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2)); and Plaintiffs' Motion to Obtain Jurisdictional Discovery (Doc. 15) are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 11/5/2014. (jem)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PC CELLULAR INC et al v. SPRINT SOLUTIONS INC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JERRY BLAND
Represented By: SARA FRANCES HOLLADAY-TOBIAS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: VIRGIN MOBILE USA LP
Represented By: SARA FRANCES HOLLADAY-TOBIAS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BOOST MOBILE LLC
Represented By: SARA FRANCES HOLLADAY-TOBIAS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SPRINT SOLUTIONS INC
Represented By: SARA FRANCES HOLLADAY-TOBIAS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: VIP WIRELESS INC
Represented By: MICHAEL PATRICK DICKEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: VIP HOLDINGS LLC
Represented By: MICHAEL PATRICK DICKEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PATRICK GROSKOPK
Represented By: JEFFREY SCOTT CARTER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JACK HUSTON
Represented By: JEFFREY SCOTT CARTER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CHADDIE SULEIMAN
Represented By: BRADFORD ALLEN PATRICK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SOUTHEAST CORPORATE STORES
Represented By: BRADFORD ALLEN PATRICK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PC CELLULAR INC
Represented By: BRADFORD ALLEN PATRICK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?