HIMKO v. ENGLISH
Petitioner: BRANDON L HIMKO
Respondent: N C ENGLISH
Case Number: 5:2016cv00035
Filed: February 8, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Panama City Office
County: Jackson
Presiding Judge: MAURICE M PAUL
Presiding Judge: ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 4, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION granting 11 Motion to Dismiss without prejudice to Petitioner's brining his claim in a civil rights action; re 17 Report and Recommendation. Signed by JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 1/4/17. (bkp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HIMKO v. ENGLISH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: BRANDON L HIMKO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: N C ENGLISH
Represented By: KRISTEN ANN FIORE
Represented By: ANDREW JABUS GROGAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?