SPENCER v. ENGLISH
Petitioner: KEVIN D SPENCER
Respondent: N C ENGLISH
Case Number: 5:2016cv00212
Filed: July 25, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Panama City Office
County: Jackson
Presiding Judge: William Terrell Hodges
Presiding Judge: CHARLES J KAHN
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER adopting 17 Report and Recommendation. Signed by William Terrell Hodges on 11/6/2017. The Clerk is directed to enter the following judgment: "The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, ECF No. 1 is denied." The Clerk is directed to close the file. (kdm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SPENCER v. ENGLISH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: KEVIN D SPENCER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: N C ENGLISH
Represented By: ANDREW JABUS GROGAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?