DENNE v. JONES
MONTE JAE DENNE |
JULIE JONES |
5:2017cv00124 |
April 27, 2017 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
Panama City Office |
Jackson |
M CASEY RODGERS |
CHARLES J KAHN |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge's 26 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The petition for writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 1 , challenging the Santa Rosa County Circuit Court's judgment in State of Florida v. Monte Jae Denne, Case No. 2011-CF-522, is DENIED. The clerk shall close the file. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 1/17/2019. (MB) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: DENNE v. JONES | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: MONTE JAE DENNE | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: JULIE JONES | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.