DENNE v. JONES
Petitioner: MONTE JAE DENNE
Respondent: JULIE JONES
Case Number: 5:2017cv00124
Filed: April 27, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Panama City Office
County: Jackson
Presiding Judge: M CASEY RODGERS
Presiding Judge: CHARLES J KAHN
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge's 26 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The petition for writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 1 , challenging the Santa Rosa County Circuit Court's judgment in State of Florida v. Monte Jae Denne, Case No. 2011-CF-522, is DENIED. The clerk shall close the file. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 1/17/2019. (MB)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DENNE v. JONES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: MONTE JAE DENNE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: JULIE JONES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?