WHITAKER v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Plaintiff: JOSHUA B WHITAKER
Defendant: INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Case Number: 5:2018cv00051
Filed: February 20, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Panama City Office
County: Bay
Presiding Judge: GARY R JONES
Presiding Judge: M CASEY RODGERS
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 26 U.S.C. ยง 7422
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 121 ORDER ADOPTING 115 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 44 , is GRANTED and Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 56 , is DENIED. The clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendant on Plaintiff's claims. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 9/26/2019. (alb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WHITAKER v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOSHUA B WHITAKER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?