PHILISTIN v. CANTRELL
JEFFNEY PHILISTIN |
B CANTRELL, S PAYNE and C NESBITT |
5:2018cv00166 |
July 16, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
Panama City Office |
Gulf |
M CASEY RODGERS |
ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
Prison Condition |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: #10 REPLY (titled, "Supplement Appendix A; Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment; Reply to Order to Show Cause"), re #7 Order to Show Cause. (MB) |
Filing 10 REPLY (titled, "Supplement Appendix A; Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment; Reply to Order to Show Cause"), re #7 Order to Show Cause, by JEFFNEY PHILISTIN. (MB) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: #8 Response to Order to Show Cause, #9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (titled, "MOTION To Proceed Without Prepayment"),. Referred to ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY. (MB) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (titled, "MOTION To Proceed Without Prepayment"), by JEFFNEY PHILISTIN. (MB) |
Filing 8 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by JEFFNEY PHILISTIN. (MB) |
Filing 7 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - Within TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS from the date of docketing of this order Plaintiff must show cause, if any, why this case should not be dismissed for failure to comply with an order of the court. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 08/23/2018. Show Cause Response due by 9/13/2018. (MB) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: #5 Initial partial filing fee not received per ORDER. (MB) |
Set Deadlines per #5 ORDER. Initial Partial Filing Fee due by 8/20/2018. (MB) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint. (Received 3 Service copies). (MB) |
Filing 6 PRISONER CONSENT & FINANCIAL CERTIFICATE by JEFFNEY PHILISTIN. (sdw) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: #6 Prisoner Consent Form & Financial Certificate. (sdw) |
Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #2 ) is GRANTED to the extent that the case may proceed without the prepayment of the entire filing fee. Clerk of court shall assess Plaintiff $10.66 as an initial partial filing fee as provided in 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1)(A). Clerk of court shall MAIL a copy of this order with the appropriate cover letter to: Department of Corrections. Fee status updated to in forma pauperis. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 07/18/2018. (Letter w/ORDER sent to DOC). (MB) |
Filing 4 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: Re #1 Complaint (Received 3 Service copies). (MB) |
Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se Litigant, JEFFNEY PHILISTIN. (MB) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by JEFFNEY PHILISTIN. (MB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against B CANTRELL, C NESBITT, S PAYNE, filed by JEFFNEY PHILISTIN. (No service copies). (MB) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint, (No service copies), #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY. (MB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.