WILLIAMS v. HUGHES et al
5:2019cv00089 |
February 16, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
Panama City Office |
Prisoner Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 66 ORDER. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted andincorporated by reference in this Order. Defendant Murrell's motion to dismiss (Doc. 64 ) is GRANTED, and the claims against her are DISMISSED for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The case is recommitted to the magistrate judge for further proceedingson the claims against Defendant Hughes. Signed by JUDGE T KENT WETHERELL II on 7/9/20201. (alb) |
Filing 62 ORDER. The magistrate judges Report and Recommendation 61 is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. Defendant Murrell's motion to dismiss (Doc. 36 ) is DENIED without prejudice to refiling after the period of limited discovery authorized by the magistrate judge. The case is recommitted to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by JUDGE T KENT WETHERELL II on 2/16/2021. (blr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: WILLIAMS v. HUGHES et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.