SHELL SHACK OF MEXICO BEACH LLC v. FRONTLINE INSURANCE UNLIMITED COMPANY
SHELL SHACK OF MEXICO BEACH, LLC |
FRONTLINE INSURANCE UNLIMITED COMPANY |
5:2019cv00535 |
December 2, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
MICHAEL J FRANK |
ROBERT L HINKLE |
Insurance |
28:1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by FRONTLINE INSURANCE UNLIMITED COMPANY ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AFLNDC-4722899.), filed by FRONTLINE INSURANCE UNLIMITED COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Declaration in Support of Removal, #2 Exhibit B. Plaintiff, Shell Shack of Mexico Beach's Sunbiz Page, #3 Exhibit C. Defendant, Frontline Insurance's Sunbiz Page, #4 Civil Cover Sheet D. Federal Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Exhibit E. State Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Exhibit F. Initial Complaint, #7 Exhibit G. Summons Issued, #8 Exhibit H. Receipt of Payment, #9 Exhibit I. Return of Service of Process, #10 Exhibit J. Defendant's Notice of Appearance and Designation of Email Addresses, #11 Exhibit K. Defendant's Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, #12 Exhibit L. Agreed Order on Defendant's Motion for Enlargment of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, #13 Exhibit M. Answer and Affirmative Defenses, #14 Exhibit N. Plaintiff's Reply to Defendant's Answer and Affirmative Defenses, #15 Exhibit O. Plaintiff's Notice for Trial, #16 Exhibit P. Plaintiff's Notice of Serving First set of Interrogatories to Defendant, Frontline Insurance Unlimited Company, #17 Exhibit Q. Plaintiff's First Request for Production to Defendant, #18 Exhibit R. Defendant's First Request for Production to Plaintiff, #19 Exhibit S. Defendant's Notice of Serving First Set of Interrogatories to Plaintiff, #20 Exhibit T. Defendant's Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Discovery, #21 Exhibit U. Agreed Order on Defendant's Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Discovery, #22 Exhibit V. Plaintiff's Responses and Objection to Defendant's First Request for Production, #23 Exhibit W. Plaintiff's Notice of Serving Answers and Objections to Defendant's First Set of Interrogatories, #24 Exhibit X. Defendant's Notice of Serving Responses to Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories, #25 Exhibit Y. Defendant's Responses to Plaintiff's First Request for Production) (SWINDOLL, ALAN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: SHELL SHACK OF MEXICO BEACH LLC v. FRONTLINE INSURANCE UNLIMITED COMPANY | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: SHELL SHACK OF MEXICO BEACH, LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: FRONTLINE INSURANCE UNLIMITED COMPANY | |
Represented By: | ALAN HENRY SWINDOLL |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.