SAPP v. HMMG LLC
amanda J sapp |
HMMG, L.L.C. d/b/a Hughston Clinic and HMMG LLC doing business as HUGHSTON CLINIC |
5:2022cv00275 |
November 28, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
MICHAEL J FRANK |
ROBERT L HINKLE |
Labor: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 NOTICE OF TELEPHONIC HEARING: Telephonic Summary Judgment Hearing set for 9/7/2023 10:00 AM EDT before JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE. Call in number: 888-684-8852Access code: 3243416#Security code: 1234#Proceedings may not be recorded or otherwise broadcast for public dissemination. s/ Cindy MarkleyCourtroom Deputy Clerk (ckm) |
Filing 10 SCHEDULING AND MEDIATION ORDER re #9 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting: The trial is set for the two-week trial period that begins on Monday, 10/16/2023. The discovery deadline is 7/7/2023. By a separate notice, the clerk must set a summary-judgment hearing for the week of September 4, 2023. The deadline to mediate is 14 days after the discovery deadline. (Dispositive Motions to be filed by 7/28/2023., Mediation Report due by 8/4/2023.), Case referred to mediation. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 1/24/2023. (jcw) |
Filing 9 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (GOODMAN, ERIKA) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE notified that action is needed Re: #9 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (mb) |
Filing 8 ORDER ON RULE 26(f) OBLIGATIONS. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 12/6/2022. (jcw) |
Filing 7 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: The deadline to file the Rule 26(f) report is 1/23/2023. Absent good cause set out in the 26(f) report, the discovery deadline will be 7/7/2023, and the trial will occur during the three-week period that begins on 10/16/2023. (Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set for 12/20/2022.) Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 12/6/2022. (jcw) |
Filing 6 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT RE #1 Notice of Removal - Attorney STEPHEN BARBER is advised by this entry, for future case openings: Please review the procedure for adding/creating new parties in the "Style Guide for Electronic Case Filing" and/or Chapter 10 of the "CM/ECF Attorney User's Guide", (both available on the clerk's website) specifically in regards to the use of UPPERCASE in the parties names and style of the case. The party names will be corrected by the clerk. (tpm) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement/Certificate of Interested Persons by HMMG LLC. (BARBER, STEPHEN) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by HMMG LLC. (BARBER, STEPHEN) |
Filing 3 NOTICE by HMMG, L.L.C. d/b/a Hughston Clinic (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Designation of E-mail Addresses in state court case, #2 Exhibit Notice of Removal in state court case) (BARBER, STEPHEN) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (BARBER, STEPHEN) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by HMMG, L.L.C. d/b/a Hughston Clinic from Bay County Circuit Court, Fourteenth Judicial Circuit, Bay County, Florida, case number 2022-CA-765. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLNDC-7576263.), filed by HMMG, L.L.C. d/b/a Hughston Clinic. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint filed by Plaintiff in state case, #2 Exhibit Declaration of Lana Folds, #3 Exhibit Civil Cover Sheet in state case, #4 Exhibit Service of Process, #5 Exhibit All Process, Pleadings, and Orders) (BARBER, STEPHEN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.