WOODS v. JONES et al
Plaintiff: LAMAR WOODS
Defendant: WILLIE R CORFT and DANIELLE K JONES
Case Number: 5:2024cv00119
Filed: June 10, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: MICHAEL J FRANK
Referring Judge: MARK E WALKER
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 2, 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #4 Order - Complaint was not filed. (jcw)
July 18, 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to MICHAEL J FRANK. (jcw)
July 17, 2024 Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by LAMAR WOODS. (jcw) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/30/2024: #1 Letter to Clerk) (jcw).
June 26, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER re #1 Complaint. The clerk of the court shall send to Plaintiff: a. a notice of voluntary dismissal form; b. a civil rights complaint for use by prisoners; and c. a form application to proceed in forma pauperis. This case number shall be written on the forms. If Plaintiff desires to proceed in this action, on or before 7/26/2024, Plaintiff shall: a. pay the $405 filing fee or submit a properly completed motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; and b. file an amended complaint on the Northern District form, titled First Amended Complaint. If Plaintiff no longer desires to proceed in this action, on or before July 26, 2024, Plaintiff shall file a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 6/26/2024. (jcw)
June 12, 2024 Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se (jcw)
June 12, 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #1 Complaint. Referred to MICHAEL J FRANK. (jcw)
June 10, 2024 Filing 2 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS by LAMAR WOODS. (Page 2 is missing. Motion is not signed.) (jcw)
June 10, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against WILLIE R CORFT, DANIELLE K JONES, filed by LAMAR WOODS. (Filing fee was not paid. No service copies filed. Complaint is not signed.) (jcw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WOODS v. JONES et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WILLIE R CORFT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DANIELLE K JONES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LAMAR WOODS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?