COKER v. SV FOOTLOOSE (VESSEL NO. 1075806) HER ENGINES ETC IN REM et al
Donald C Coker |
SV Privateer (Vessel No. 1231827), her engines, etc., in rem, SV Footloose (Vessel No. 1075806), her engines, etc., in rem and SV Ohana (Vessel No. 1103235), her engines, etc., in rem |
5:2024cv00239 |
October 22, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
MICHAEL J FRANK |
ALLEN C WINSOR |
Contract: Marine |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 Admiralty |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 1 ADMIRALITY CLAIM Verified Complaint against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AFLNDC-9107332.), filed by Donald C Coker. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 - Promissory Note, #3 Exhibit 2 - Security Agreement, #4 Exhibit 3 - Footloose Preferred Ship Mortgage, #5 Exhibit 4 - Privateer Preferred Ship Mortgage, #6 Exhibit 5 - Ohana Preferred Ship Mortgage, #7 Exhibit 6 - State Court Order Confirmation of Arbitral Orders, #8 Exhibit 7 - Interim Emergency Order, #9 Exhibit 8 - Amended Order Appointing Receiver, #10 Supplement Motion For Issuance of Warrant in Rem, #11 Supplement Motion For Appointment of Substitute Custodian, #12 Exhibit 1- Declaration of Barry Lynch in Support of Motion For Appointment of Substitute Custodian) (ENGLANDER, ALEX) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.