The City of Fort Lauderdale v. Hezzekiah Scott, et al
Plaintiff: The City of Fort Lauderdale
Defendant: Hezzekiah Scott, THE CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, A Florida Municipal Corporation, Plaintiff/Counterdefendant: v. Hezzekiah Scott, Defendant and HEZZEKIAH SCOTT; VIRGIL BOLDEN; GLORIA BURNELL; THE ESTATE OF WALTER TIRSCHMAN; and KAREN MCNAIR, Counterplaintiffs v. THE CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, A Florida Municipal Corporation, Plaintiff/counterde
Case Number: 0:2010cv61122
Filed: July 1, 2010
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Office: Ft. Lauderdale Office
County: Broward
Presiding Judge: James I. Cohn
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 290 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 280 Counter-Defendants' Motion to Tax Costs; denying 285 Counter-Plaintiffs' Motion to Stay Decision on Costs. Please see Order for details. Signed by Judge James I. Cohn on 2/27/2013. (sry)
August 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 278 ORDER granting 192 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 275 Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot 234 Motion in Limine. Please see Order for details. Signed by Judge James I. Cohn on 8/23/2012. (sry)
April 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 236 ORDER granting 182 Motion to Strike Expert Witnesses; denying 187 Motion to Continue; granting in part and denying in part 229 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response re 192 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 5/22/2012. Order Continuing Trial. See Order for details. Signed by Judge James I. Cohn on 4/30/2012. (prd)
March 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 180 WRITTEN ORDER granting [DE 168] Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant City of Fort Lauderdale's and City of Homestead Manager George Gretsas' MOTION for Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barry S. Seltzer on 3/7/2012. (kas)
July 26, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 125 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 113 Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Counterclaim; denying 123 Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply. See order for details. Signed by Judge James I. Cohn on 7/26/2011. (prd)
March 21, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 108 ORDER denying 94 Motion for Reconsideration re 91 Order on Motion to Dismiss; denying 100 Motion to Strike; granting 103 Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply. Signed by Judge James I. Cohn on 3/18/2011. (prd)
February 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 102 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 29 the City's Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 43 Motion to Stay; denying 70 Motion to Strike; granting 71 Motion to Amend Scheduling Order; denying 84 Motion for Immediate Discovery; denying without prejudice 16 Motion to Certify Class. Signed by Judge James I. Cohn on 2/28/2011. (prd)
January 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 91 ORDER granting 23 Federal Counter-Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; Counter-Defendants Shaun Donovan and HUD are hereby dismissed; Order denying as moot 31 Motion to Stay, denying as moot 39 Motion to Vacate Scheduling Order, denying as moot 26 Motion to Strike Demand for Jury Trial. Signed by Judge James I. Cohn on 1/19/2011. (prd)
September 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER granting 28 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages; denying as moot 41 Motion to Stay; granting 42 Motion to Strike; granting 44 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response and 46 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response re 23 MOTION to Dismiss, 29 MOTION to Dismiss, 43 MOTION to Stay Discovery Until Disposition of Motion to Dismiss / Motion to Enforce State Court Stay Order, 26 MOTION to Strike COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S JURY DEMAND FOR CLAIMS AGAINST THE FEDERAL COUNTER DEFENDANTS, and to file Reply in Support of 16 First MOTION to Certify Class; granting 20 and 21 Motions for Extension of Time; granting 22 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. Signed by Judge James I. Cohn on 9/21/2010. (prd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: The City of Fort Lauderdale v. Hezzekiah Scott, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: The City of Fort Lauderdale
Represented By: Marilynn Koonce Lindsey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hezzekiah Scott
Represented By: Marilynn Koonce Lindsey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: THE CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, A Florida Municipal Corporation, Plaintiff/Counterdefendant: v. Hezzekiah Scott, Defendant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HEZZEKIAH SCOTT; VIRGIL BOLDEN; GLORIA BURNELL; THE ESTATE OF WALTER TIRSCHMAN; and KAREN MCNAIR, Counterplaintiffs v. THE CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, A Florida Municipal Corporation, Plaintiff/counterde
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?