Haynes v. Genesco, Inc
Plaintiff: Dennis Haynes
Defendant: Genesco, Inc
Case Number: 0:2017cv61641
Filed: August 16, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Office: Ft Lauderdale Office
County: Broward (Office: Ft Lauderdale)
Presiding Judge: K Michael Moore
Referring Judge: Lurana S Snow
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 35 PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon a Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice #34 . UPON CONSIDERATION of the Stipulation #34 , the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the above-styled cause is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. The Clerk of Court is instructed to CLOSE this case. All pending motions, if any, are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 5/17/2018. (cce)
May 17, 2018 Filing 34 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice by Dennis Haynes (Cullen, Philip)
May 17, 2018 Civil Case Terminated. Closing Case. (cce) NOTICE: If there are sealed documents in this case, they may be unsealed after 1 year or as directed by Court Order, unless they have been designated to be permanently sealed. See Local Rule 5.4 and Administrative Order 2014-69.
March 13, 2018 Filing 33 RESPONSE to Motion re #26 Defendant's MOTION to Vacate Deadlines for Defendant Only filed by Dennis Haynes. Replies due by 3/20/2018. (Cullen, Philip)
March 9, 2018 Filing 32 RESPONSE in Support re #26 Defendant's MOTION to Vacate Deadlines for Defendant Only filed by Genesco, Inc. (Blair, Brian)
March 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER denying #27 Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow on 3/1/2018. (vmz)
February 28, 2018 Filing 30 RESPONSE in Opposition re #27 Plaintiff's MOTION for Protective Order filed by Genesco, Inc. Replies due by 3/7/2018. (Blair, Brian)
February 27, 2018 Filing 29 RESPONSE in Support re #24 MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice #23 Amended Complaint filed by Genesco, Inc. (Blair, Brian)
February 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 28 EXPEDITED ORDER TO RESPOND re #27 Plaintiff's MOTION for Protective Order filed by Dennis Haynes.( Responses due by 2/28/2018) Signed by Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow on 2/26/2018. (vmz)
February 25, 2018 Filing 27 Plaintiff's MOTION for Protective Order by Dennis Haynes. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Cullen, Philip)
February 22, 2018 Filing 26 Defendant's MOTION to Vacate Deadlines for Defendant Only by Genesco, Inc. Responses due by 3/8/2018 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Blair, Brian)
February 20, 2018 Filing 25 RESPONSE in Opposition re #24 MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice #23 Amended Complaint filed by Dennis Haynes. Replies due by 2/27/2018. (Cullen, Philip)
February 6, 2018 Filing 24 MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice #23 Amended Complaint by Genesco, Inc. Responses due by 2/20/2018 (Blair, Brian)
January 23, 2018 Filing 23 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Genesco, Inc filed in response to Order Granting Motion for Leave, filed by Dennis Haynes.(Cullen, Philip)
January 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER granting #10 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 1/11/2018. (cce)
November 8, 2017 Filing 21 REPLY to Response to Motion re #10 MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice #1 Complaint filed by Genesco, Inc. (Blair, Brian) -Modified text on 11/9/2017 (gp).-
November 6, 2017 Filing 20 NOTICE of Mediator Selection. Added ALVIN M CAPP. (Cullen, Philip)
November 1, 2017 Filing 19 RESPONSE in Opposition re #10 MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice #1 Complaint filed by Dennis Haynes. Replies due by 11/8/2017. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Statement of Interest)(Cullen, Philip)
October 26, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 18 PAPERLESS ORDER OF REFERRAL TO MEDIATION. Trial having been set in this matter for the two week trial period beginning June 11, 2018 at 9 a.m. pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure and Rule 16.2 of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. All parties are required to participate in mediation. The mediation shall be completed no later than eighty (80) days before the scheduled trial date. 2. Plaintiff's counsel, or another attorney agreed upon by all counsel of record and any unrepresented parties, shall be responsible for scheduling the mediation conference. The parties are encouraged to avail themselves of the services of any mediator on the List of Certified Mediators, maintained in the office of the Clerk of this Court, but may select any other mediator. The parties shall agree upon a mediator and file a Notice of Mediator Selection within fifteen (15) days from the date of this Order. If there is no agreement, lead counsel shall file a request for the Clerk of Court to appoint a mediator in writing within fifteen (15) days from the date of this Order, and the Clerk shall designate a mediator from the List of Certified Mediators. Designation shall be made on a blind rotation basis. 3. A place, date, and time for mediation convenient to the mediator, counsel of record, and unrepresented parties shall be established. If the parties cannot agree to a place, date, and time for the mediation, they may motion the Court for an order dictating the place, date, and time. 4. The physical presence of counsel and each party or representatives of each party with full authority to enter in a full and complete compromise and settlement is mandatory. If insurance is involved, an adjuster with authority up to the policy limits or the most recent demand, whichever is lower, shall attend. 5. All discussions, representations and statements made at the mediation conference shall be confidential and privileged. 6. At least ten (10) days prior to the mediation date, all parties shall present to the mediator a brief written summary of the case identifying issues to be resolved. Copies of those summaries shall be served on all other parties. 7. The Court may impose sanctions against parties and/or counsel who do not comply with the attendance or settlement authority requirements herein, or who otherwise violate the terms of this Order. The mediator shall report non-attendance and may recommend imposition of sanctions by the Court for non-attendance. 8. The mediator shall be compensated in accordance with the standing order of the Court entered pursuant to Rule 16.2.B.6, or on such basis as may be agreed to in writing by the parties and the mediator selected by the parties. The cost of mediation shall be shared equally by the parties unless otherwise ordered by the Court. All payments shall be remitted to the mediator within 30 days of the date of the bill. Notice to the mediator of cancellation or settlement prior to the scheduled mediation conference must be given at least two (2) full business days in advance. Failure to do so will result in imposition of a fee for one hour. 9. If a full or partial settlement is reached in this case, counsel shall promptly notify the Court of the settlement in accordance with Local Rule 16.2.F, by filing a notice of settlement signed by the counsel of record within ten (10) days of the mediation conference. Thereafter, the parties shall forthwith submit an appropriate pleading concluding the case. 10. Within five (5) days following the mediation conference, the mediator shall file a Mediation Report indicating whether all required parties were present. The report shall also indicate whether the case settled (in full or in part), was continued with the consent of the parties, or whether the mediator declared an impasse. 11. If mediation is not conducted, the case may be stricken from the trial calendar, and other sanctions may be imposed. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 10/26/2017. (cce)
October 26, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 17 PAPERLESS ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL IN FORT LAUDERDALE. This case is now set for trial commencing the two week trial period of June 11, 2018, at 9 a.m. in the United States District Courthouse, 299 East Broward Boulevard, Fort Lauderdale, Florida. The assigned courtroom will be announced at the calendar call. All parties are directed to report to the calendar call on June 7, 2018, at 2 p.m., at which time all matters relating to the scheduled trial date may be brought to the attention of the Court. A final pretrial conference as provided for by Rule 16, Fed. R. Civ. P., and Rule 16.1(C), S.D. Fla. L.R., is scheduled for May 29, 2018 at 11 a.m. The calendar call and the final pretrial conference will take place in Courtroom 13-1 (thirteenth floor), United States District Courthouse, 400 North Miami Avenue, Miami, Florida. A bilateral pretrial stipulation and all other pretrial preparations shall be completed NO LATER THAN FIVE DAYS PRIOR TO THE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. All motions to amend the pleadings or to join additional parties must be filed by the later of forty-five (45) days after the date of entry of this Order, or forty-five (45) days after the first responsive pleading by the last responding defendant. Any and all pretrial motions, including motions for summary judgment, Daubert motions, and motions in limine must be filed no later than eighty (80) days prior to the trial date. Responses to summary judgment motions must be filed no later than fourteen (14) days after service of the motion, and replies in support of the motion must be filed no later than seven (7) days after service of the response, with both deadlines computed as specified in Rule 6, Fed. R. Civ. P. Each party is limited to one Daubert motion. If all evidentiary issues cannot be addressed in a 20-page memorandum, the parties must file for leave to exceed the page limit. Each party is also limited to one motion in limine (other than Daubert motions). If all evidentiary issues cannot be addressed in a 20-page memorandum, the parties must file for leave to exceed the page limit. All discovery, including expert discovery, shall be completed one hundred (100) days prior to the date of trial. The failure to engage in discovery pending settlement negotiations shall not be grounds for continuance of the trial date. All exhibits must be pre-marked, and a typewritten exhibit list setting forth the number and description of each exhibit must be submitted at the time of trial. Plaintiff's exhibits shall be marked numerically with the letter "P" as a prefix. Defendant's exhibits shall be marked numerically with the letter "D" as a prefix. For a jury trial, counsel shall prepare and submit proposed jury instructions to the Court. The Parties shall submit their proposed jury instructions and verdict form jointly, although they do not need to agree on each proposed instruction. Where the parties do not agree on a proposed instruction, that instruction shall be set forth in bold type. Instructions proposed only by a plaintiff should be underlined. Instructions proposed only by a defendant should be italicized. Every instruction must be supported by citation to authority. The parties should use the Eleventh Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions for Civil Cases as a guide, including the directions to counsel contained therein. The parties shall jointly file their proposed jury instructions via CM/ECF, and shall also submit their proposed jury instructions to the Court via e-mail at moore@flsd.uscourts.gov in WordPerfect or Word format. For a non-jury trial, the parties shall prepare and submit to the Court proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law fully supported by the evidence, which counsel expects the trial to develop, and fully supported by citations to law. The proposed jury instructions or the proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law shall be submitted to the Court no later than five (5) business days prior to the scheduled trial date. Pursuant to Administrative Order 2016-70 of the Southern District of Florida and consistent with the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuits Local Rules and Internal Operating Procedures, within three days of the conclusion of a trial or other proceeding, parties must file via CM/ECF electronic versions of documentary exhibits admitted into evidence, including photographs of non-documentary physical exhibits. The Parties are directed to comply with each of the requirements set forth in Administrative Order 2016-70 unless directed otherwise by the Court. THE FILING BY COUNSEL OF A NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY BY MOTION OR OTHERWISE IS NOT PROVIDED FOR UNDER THE LOCAL RULES AND SHALL NOT BE PRESUMED TO ALTER OR MODIFY THE COURT'S SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 10/26/2017. (cce) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here.
October 25, 2017 Filing 16 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by Dennis Haynes (Cullen, Philip)
October 24, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 15 PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiff's Motion #14 for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion #14 , the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, the Motion #14 is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file a response on or before November 3, 2017. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 10/24/2017. (cce)
October 24, 2017 Reset Deadlines per 15 Order as to #10 MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice #1 Complaint . Responses due by 11/3/2017 (asl)
October 23, 2017 Filing 14 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #10 MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice #1 Complaint by Dennis Haynes. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Cullen, Philip)
October 10, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 13 PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Defendant's Motions to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filings [11, 12]. UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motions [11, 12], the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motions [11, 12] are GRANTED. Joel Griswold and Bonnie Keane DelGobbo may appear Pro Hac Vice in this matter. The Clerk of the Court shall provide electronic notification of all electronic filings to jcgriswold@bakerlaw.com and bdelgobbo@bakerlaw.com. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 10/10/2017. (cce)
October 10, 2017 Filing 12 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Bonnie Keane DelGobbo. Filing Fee $ 75.00 Receipt # 113C-10096452 by Genesco, Inc. Responses due by 10/24/2017 (Blair, Brian)
October 10, 2017 Filing 11 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Joel Griswold. Filing Fee $ 75.00 Receipt # 113C-10096426 by Genesco, Inc. Responses due by 10/24/2017 (Blair, Brian)
October 9, 2017 Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice #1 Complaint by Genesco, Inc. Responses due by 10/23/2017 (Blair, Brian)
October 3, 2017 Reset Answer Due Deadline per 9 Order: Genesco, Inc response due 10/9/2017. (asl)
October 3, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 9 PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Defendant's Unopposed Motion #8 for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint. UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion #8 , the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, the Motion #8 is hereby GRANTED nunc pro tunc. Defendant shall respond to the Complaint on or before October 9, 2017. Defendant's previous Motion #7 for Extension of Time is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 10/3/2017. (cce)
October 2, 2017 Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by Genesco, Inc. (Blair, Brian)
September 6, 2017 Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by Genesco, Inc. Attorney Brian Clayborne Blair added to party Genesco, Inc(pty:dft). (Blair, Brian)
August 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 6 GENERAL ORDER ON DISCOVERY OBJECTIONS AND PROCEDURES. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow on 8/17/2017. (kpe)
August 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 5 PAPERLESS ORDER REFERRING PRETRIAL DISCOVERY MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE LURANA S. SNOW. PURSUANT to 28 U.S.C. 636 and the Magistrate Rules of the Local Rules of the Southern District of Florida, the above-captioned Cause is referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow to take all necessary and proper action as required by law with respect to any and all pretrial discovery matters. Any motion affecting deadlines set by the Court's Scheduling Order is excluded from this referral, unless specifically referred by separate Order. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall comply with Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snows discovery procedures, which the parties shall be advised of by the entry of an Order. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 8/17/2017. (aby)
August 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 4 PAPERLESS PRETRIAL ORDER. This order has been entered upon the filing of the complaint. Plaintiff's counsel is hereby ORDERED to forward to all defendants, upon receipt of a responsive pleading, a copy of this Order. It is further ORDERED that S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1 shall apply to this case and the parties shall hold a scheduling conference no later than twenty (20) days after the filing of the first responsive pleading by the last responding defendant, or within sixty (60) days after the filing of the complaint, whichever occurs first. However, if all defendants have not been served by the expiration of this deadline, Plaintiff shall move for an enlargement of time to hold the scheduling conference, not to exceed 90 days from the filing of the Complaint. Within ten (10) days of the scheduling conference, counsel shall file a joint scheduling report. Failure of counsel to file a joint scheduling report within the deadlines set forth above may result in dismissal, default, and the imposition of other sanctions including attorney's fees and costs. The parties should note that the time period for filing a joint scheduling report is not tolled by the filing of any other pleading, such as an amended complaint or Rule 12 motion. The scheduling conference may be held via telephone. At the conference, the parties shall comply with the following agenda that the Court adopts from S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1: (1) Documents (S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1.B.1 and 2) - The parties shall determine the procedure for exchanging a copy of, or a description by category and location of, all documents and other evidence that is reasonably available and that a party expects to offer or may offer if the need arises. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(B). (a) Documents include computations of the nature and extent of any category of damages claimed by the disclosing party unless the computations are privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(C). (b) Documents include insurance agreements which may be at issue with the satisfaction of the judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(D). (2) List of Witnesses - The parties shall exchange the name, address and telephone number of each individual known to have knowledge of the facts supporting the material allegations of the pleading filed by the party. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(A). The parties have a continuing obligation to disclose this information. (3) Discussions and Deadlines (S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1.B.2) - The parties shall discuss the nature and basis of their claims and defenses and the possibilities for a prompt settlement or resolution of the case. Failure to comply with this Order or to exchange the information listed above may result in sanctions and/or the exclusion of documents or witnesses at the time of trial. S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1.I. Pursuant to Administrative Order 2016-70 of the Southern District of Florida and consistent with the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuits Local Rules and Internal Operating Procedures, within three days of the conclusion of a trial or other proceeding, parties must file via CM/ECF electronic versions of documentary exhibits admitted into evidence, including photographs of non-documentary physical exhibits. The Parties are directed to comply with each of the requirements set forth in Administrative Order 2016-70 unless directed otherwise by the Court.Telephonic appearances are not permitted for any purpose. Upon reaching a settlement in this matter the parties are instructed to notify the Court by telephone and to file a Notice of Settlement within twenty-four (24) hours. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 8/17/2017. (aby)
August 16, 2017 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Genesco, Inc. (lrz1)
August 16, 2017 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Chief Judge K. Michael Moore and Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (lrz1)
August 16, 2017 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Genesco, Inc. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-9977321, filed by Dennis Haynes. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Cullen, Philip)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Haynes v. Genesco, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Genesco, Inc
Represented By: Brian Clayborne Blair
Represented By: Bonnie Keane DelGobbo
Represented By: Joel Christopher Griswold
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dennis Haynes
Represented By: Philip Michael Cullen, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?