Saks v. The Law Offices of Mitchell D. Bluhm & Associates, LLC et al
| Allen Saks |
| John Does 1-25, CF Medical LLC and The Law Offices of Mitchell D. Bluhm & Associates, LLC |
| 0:2019cv60232 |
| January 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Darrin P Gayles |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by Allen Saks (Zeig, Justin) |
Filing 15
ENDORSED ORDER REQUIRING JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT AND PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER. Pursuant to S.D. Fla. Local Rule 16.1, on or before March 29, 2019, the parties shall prepare and file a Joint Scheduling Report, as well as Certificates of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statements.The parties shall also file a Proposed Scheduling Order, adhering to the format and guidance of the attached form. If the parties deviate in any way from that format and guidance, they shall contemporaneously submit a written explanation, which provides their purported justification for each and every deviation. If the parties fail to submit such written explanation, the Court may enter a Scheduling Order that does not take into account the parties' proposed dates.Failure to comply with this Order shall be grounds for dismissal without prejudice and without further notice. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles See attached document for full details. (lfn)
|
| Filing 14 Corporate Disclosure Statement by CF Medical LLC identifying Corporate Parent Capio Acquisitions, LLC, Other Affiliate Capio Asset Holdings, LLC for CF Medical LLC (Morris, Rachel) |
| Filing 13 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by CF Medical LLC. (Morris, Rachel) |
| Filing 12 Corporate Disclosure Statement by The Law Offices of Mitchell D. Bluhm & Associates, LLC (Morris, Rachel) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by The Law Offices of Mitchell D. Bluhm & Associates, LLC. (Morris, Rachel) |
| Filing 10 Clerks Notice to Filer re #7 Summons Returned Executed. Incorrect Service Date Entered; ERROR - The incorrect service date was entered. The correction was made by the Clerk and filing was re-docketed, see 9 Summons Returned Executed. It is not necessary to refile this document. (kpe) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Allen Saks. The Law Offices of Mitchell D. Bluhm & Associates, LLC served on 1/31/2019, answer due 2/21/2019. See DE #7 for image. (kpe) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Allen Saks. CF Medical LLC served on 1/31/2019, answer due 2/21/2019. (Zeig, Justin) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Allen Saks. The Law Offices of Mitchell D. Bluhm & Associates, LLC served on 1/31/2019, answer due 3/7/2019. (Zeig, Justin) |
|
Filing 6
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #5 Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendants, The Law Offices of Mitchell D. Bluhm & Associates, LLC and CF Medical LLC, shall file their response on or before March 7, 2019. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (lfn)
|
| Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint, by CF Medical LLC, The Law Offices of Mitchell D. Bluhm & Associates, LLC. Attorney Rachel A. Morris added to party CF Medical LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Rachel A. Morris added to party The Law Offices of Mitchell D. Bluhm & Associates, LLC(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Unopposed Motion for Extension)(Morris, Rachel) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. Unless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion shall be double-spaced in Times New Roman 12-point typeface. Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the striking of the motion or dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (lfn) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to CF Medical LLC, The Law Offices of Mitchell D. Bluhm & Associates, LLC. (kpe) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Barry S. Seltzer is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (kpe) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CF Medical LLC, John Does 1-25, The Law Offices of Mitchell D. Bluhm & Associates, LLC. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11347329, filed by Allen Saks. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit a, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summon(s) Law Office, #4 Summon(s) CF)(Zeig, Justin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
