United States of America v. Gies et al
| United States of America |
| Theodor Gunter Gies, Kathleen Gies, Guenter Gies and Bank Of America, N.A. |
| 0:2019cv60772 |
| March 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| William P Dimitrouleas |
| Lurana S Snow |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1345 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED #19 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RESPONDTO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS. Responses due by 7/24/2019 Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 7/9/2019. See attached document for full details. (kpe)
|
| Filing 19 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #18 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint, by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Croke, Danielle) |
| Filing 18 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint, by Kathleen Gies, Theodor Gunter Gies. Responses due by 7/9/2019 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Verdict From prior matter, #2 Exhibit Paperless Order from another matter, #3 Exhibit Excerpts from Forfeiture Manual)(Brochu, Monique) |
|
Filing 17
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #13 Motion for Extension of Time to File. Defendants shall respond to the Complaint on or before June 26, 2019. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 5/29/2019. (mkz)
|
| Set Deadlines/Hearings Bank Of America, N.A. answer due 6/26/2019; Kathleen Gies answer/response due 6/26/2019; Theodor Gunter Gies answer due 6/26/2019 Per DE#17. (cqs) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., ONLY. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 5/8/2019. See attached document for full details. (kpe)
|
| Filing 15 STIPULATION of Dismissal as to Defendant, Bank of America, Only by United States of America (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Croke, Danielle) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY by Kathleen Gies, Theodor Gunter Gies for dates of May 27, 2019 through June 24, 2019 (Brochu, Monique) |
| Filing 13 Defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint, by Kathleen Gies, Theodor Gunter Gies. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Brochu, Monique) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Monique Arianne Brochu on behalf of Theodor Gunter Gies. Attorney Monique Arianne Brochu added to party Theodor Gunter Gies(pty:dft). (Brochu, Monique) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Monique Arianne Brochu on behalf of Kathleen Gies. Attorney Monique Arianne Brochu added to party Kathleen Gies(pty:dft). (Brochu, Monique) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by United States of America. Theodor Gunter Gies served on 4/22/2019, answer due 5/13/2019. (Croke, Danielle) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by United States of America. Kathleen Gies served on 4/10/2019, answer due 5/1/2019. (Croke, Danielle) |
| Set/Reset Answer Due Deadline: Bank Of America, N.A. response due 5/8/2019.SEE DE 8 ORDER (ail) |
|
Filing 8
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant Bank of America, N.A. shall respond to the Complaint on or before May 8, 2019. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 4/18/2019. (mkz)
|
| Filing 7 Agreed MOTION for Extension of Time to respond to Complaint re #1 Complaint, by Bank Of America, N.A.. Responses due by 5/2/2019 (Kaufman, Dora) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Dora Faye Kaufman on behalf of Bank Of America, N.A.. Attorney Dora Faye Kaufman added to party Bank Of America, N.A.(pty:dft). (Kaufman, Dora) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by United States of America. Bank Of America, N.A. served on 3/28/2019, answer due 4/18/2019. (Croke, Danielle) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REQUIRING COUNSEL TO MEET, FILE JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT AND JOINT DISCOVERY REPORT. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 3/27/2019. See attached document for full details. (kpe)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Bank Of America, N.A., Kathleen Gies, Theodor Gunter Gies. (kpe) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge William P. Dimitrouleas and Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (kpe) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT to Foreclose against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 400.00. USA Filer - No Filing Fee Required, filed by The United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s) T. Gies, #3 Summon(s) K. Gies, #4 Summon(s) Bank of America, #5 Exhibit A, #6 Exhibit B, #7 Exhibit C, #8 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Complaint Cover Sheet)(Croke, Danielle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
