Zumba Fitness, LLC v. J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.
Zumba Fitness, LLC |
J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc. |
0:2019cv62035 |
August 14, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Rodney Smith |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 PAPERLESS ORDER GRANTING IN PART #6 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to file the Joint Scheduling Report, Certificate of Interested Parties, and Corporate Disclosure Statement. The Joint Scheduling Report, Certificate of Interested Parties, and Corporate Disclosure Statement shall be filed no later than October 22, 2019. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 9/24/2019. (lbn) |
Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Joint Scheduling Report, Certificates of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statement re #5 Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report, by Zumba Fitness, LLC. Responses due by 10/8/2019 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Vining, Jaime) |
Filing 5 ORDER REQUIRING JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT, CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (Joint Scheduling Report due by 9/27/2019) Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 8/21/2019. See attached document for full details. (jao) |
Filing 4 FORM AO 120 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK (Attachments: #1 Supplement Complaint and Exhibits) (jao) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.. (jao) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodney Smith. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jao) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition, Dilution and Related Claims against J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11901757, filed by Zumba Fitness, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summon(s) for J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.)(Vining, Jaime) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Zumba Fitness, LLC v. J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Zumba Fitness, LLC | |
Represented By: | David Kenneth Friedland |
Represented By: | Jaime Rich Vining |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.