Caplan v. AMIGOS FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP.
| Howard Michael Caplan |
| AMIGOS FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP. |
| 0:2019cv62773 |
| November 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Federico A Moreno |
| Civil Rights: Accommodations |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Clerks Entry of Default as to Amigos Financial Services Corp. per Order Directing Clerk to Enter Default Re: #7 Order Directing Clerk to Enter Default. Signed by DEPUTY CLERK on 12/13/2019. (jas) |
Filing 7
Order Directing Clerk to Enter Default as to AMIGOS FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP. Closing case. Signed by Judge Federico A. Moreno on 12/13/2019. See attached document for full details. (mmc)
|
| Civil Case Terminated. Closing Case. (mmc) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Howard Michael Caplan. AMIGOS FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP. served on 11/19/2019, answer due 12/10/2019. (Stern, Ronald) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Counsel re #4 Notice of Court Practice/to Appear/Other, by Ronald E. Stern on behalf of Howard Michael Caplan (Stern, Ronald) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Court Practice in ADA cases. Verified certificate of counsel due no later than November 25, 2019. Failure to file response by that date may result in dismissal. Signed by Judge Federico A. Moreno on 11/15/2019. See attached document for full details. (mmc) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to AMIGOS FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP.. (ebz) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Federico A. Moreno. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Barry S. Seltzer is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (ebz) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-12127024, filed by Howard Michael Caplan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Stern, Ronald) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Caplan v. AMIGOS FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Howard Michael Caplan | |
| Represented By: | Ronald E. Stern |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: AMIGOS FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
