Rowe et al v. Pennymac Corp. et al
Plaintiff: Florizel Rowe and Hyacinth Rowe
Defendant: Marinosci Law Group, P.C., P.A. and Pennymac Corp.
Case Number: 0:2019cv62829
Filed: November 13, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Federico A Moreno
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting #8 #10 Defendants' Motions to Dismiss. Closing Case. Signed by Judge Federico A. Moreno on 12/23/2019. See attached document for full details. (mmd)
December 10, 2019 Filing 11 STATUS REPORT /Joint Removal Status Report by Pennymac Corp. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Gottlieb, Marc)
December 6, 2019 Filing 10 Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint) FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM with Prejudice by Marinosci Law Group, P.C., P.A.. Responses due by 12/20/2019 (Perez, Gladys)
November 26, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE IN REMOVAL CASES. Signed by Judge Federico A. Moreno on 11/25/2019. See attached document for full details. (mmd)
November 25, 2019 Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss the State Court Complaint contained within the Notice of Removal with Prejudice #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint) by Pennymac Corp.. Responses due by 12/9/2019 (Gottlieb, Marc)
November 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendant Marinosci Law Group, P.C., P.A. may file a response to the complaint by no later than December 6, 2019. Signed by Judge Federico A. Moreno on 11/21/2019. (mmd)
November 21, 2019 Reset Deadlines Marinosci Law Group, P.C., P.A. answer due 12/6/2019 Per DE#7. (cqs)
November 20, 2019 Reset Deadlines Pennymac Corp. answer due 11/25/2019 Per DE#6. (cqs)
November 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #4 Defendant Pennymac Corp.'s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to the Complaint. Defendant Pennymac Corp. may file a response to the complaint by no later than November 25, 2019. Signed by Judge Federico A. Moreno on 11/19/2019. (mmd)
November 19, 2019 Filing 5 Defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer to Plaintiffs' Complaint by Marinosci Law Group, P.C., P.A.. Attorney Gladys Perez added to party Marinosci Law Group, P.C., P.A.(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order)(Perez, Gladys)
November 18, 2019 Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint) by Pennymac Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Gottlieb, Marc)
November 14, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Geoffrey L. Travis on behalf of Marinosci Law Group, P.C., P.A.. Attorney Geoffrey L. Travis added to party Marinosci Law Group, P.C., P.A.(pty:dft). (Travis, Geoffrey)
November 13, 2019 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Federico A. Moreno. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Barry S. Seltzer is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jas)
November 13, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Verified Complaint) Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-12145629, filed by Pennymac Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C)(Gottlieb, Marc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rowe et al v. Pennymac Corp. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Florizel Rowe
Represented By: Adam Ira Skolnik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hyacinth Rowe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marinosci Law Group, P.C., P.A.
Represented By: Geoffrey L. Travis
Represented By: Gladys Perez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pennymac Corp.
Represented By: Marc Jonathan Gottlieb
Represented By: Mario O. Marin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?